Why are you people trying to engage these two pig-fuckers? It’s not like you are going to convince any lurkers that they are too stupid to breathe. I think David Duke would acknowledge that fact. NDD and brazil need to just be banned for trollery and public displays of stupid and we can go on to more important things, like when the McRib is coming back.
Perhaps you could, when you can fit it into your busy schedule, give us all a rundown on those race/IQ studies to which you’ve devoted considerable thought and consideration. Your expertise would be a real asset.
Close minded buffoons have always fascinated me. I’m surrounded by close-mindedness almost every day, so it’s sort of cathartic to just vent and mock these guys by proxy for every illogical, stubbornly idiotic, bigoted, credulous or otherwise paranoid and delusional person I have to deal with every so often, but can’t confront to this ostensibly insane degree.
But trust me, ironically, it’s a great stress reliever.
Berbers ain’t white.
Why?
Because if they are left in silence, then it is assumed they have made the points. But in these long arguments, we know that they are hopeless relative to these two very stupid persons, but they are useful to show their contradictions, their lies that they need to make this archaic view work in the face of the mountains of genetics.
It was worth it to see the idiot cretin NDD jump on his made up explanation that somehow the contamination of The Black is an explanation of the false statistics of this Lynn, and to see again that he reads not the citations given - because the Greeks in this question were the Jews that he takes such care to praise for their high intelligence. Of course his reaction was a stupid one that had no historical sense because it contradicts his ridiculous ad hoc theory of civilisation promoting genetic intelligence when we think of the long record of the Eastern Romans after the Western Romans fell to the germanic barbarians. Or how civilisation began in the places that by his logic are most contaminated by The Black. It again highlighted that his arguments have no logic to them, have no consistency internally, no care for the science and the data. They are his own Fables of Esope made up to explain and to justify his pitiful hatreds. Or the highlighting of how he selects crime ‘data’ and rejects anything that does not fit the pre-conceived ideas he has, as the case of the Sahel countries of West Africa (not that this idea of comparing crime statistics has any sense to it, as there is no standardisation, but it is his own petard he is hoist on). Interpol data, he rejects it if it does not fit his ideas. What great rigour! It is his political concerns that reign.
I will say that I think if this had not been done, many readers would have thought he had some basis for claiming things about crime in Africa when we have seen in fact he knows nothing very much beyond his own american situation.
I have no care for the ridiculous american politics or those policies that seem to burn them. But the prejudices they are worth showing as idiotic.
Except the powers-that-be have made it clear that they aren’t going to be banned for this, so we’re stuck with them stinking up our board.
Plus I’m hoping we can eclipse the Paterno thread length in 6 months or so…
Some are. Some are not. The Tarifite can often be red-headed and very pale, as the wife of the King of Morocco is. My Tachelhite cousins can look as if they are from the Peul. And the genetic research shows Morocco has had very large sub-Saharan influences, both recent and ancient. There has long been papers, since the French, connecting some of the black Tachelhite speaking populations to the Sahelian type populations of the Sahara that moved to the north rather to the south as the Sahara dried.
NDD, a hypothetical, for fun. Y’know to lighten things up.
If you had to choose, which would yo be reborn as:
- a black person, born in South Compton, a family income of 20k a year, 5 brothers and sisters, gang violence surround you, but yo have the IQ in the mid to high 140s.
Or
- A white person, born into wealth and privilege, with your veritable choice of private schools to attend, except these schools are more catered for the mentally challenged, since your IQ won’t top 72, but hey, your jammies have Yodas and shit on them.
Which door do you choose? Door one, or door two?
Let me rephrase that - Berbers ain’t all white.
Let me explain it to you:
You make stuff up.
You have no interest in listening to any argument.
You change your words to whatever supports your cause.
You’re a racist pig headed idiot.
You are a lying-weaselling-fucking-retarded-pigheaded-idiotic-stupid-narrow minded-racist-moron!!!
Now go and have some more incest and enjoy banging your sister and your mother while your dad is having fun with yourself.
I posted one credible source that indicates that Senegal has a murder rate over three times the U.S. murder rate. If Senegal really does have a lower murder rate than the United States it is too much of an exception to draw many conclusions from.
I have posted several studies of British schools that indicated that there is a performance gap there.
As far as Nigeria is concerned, in 2000 of 109,160 Nigerian immigrants who came to the United States 90,620 came over with college or vocational school education.
According to The CIA World Factbook, in 2012 the population of Nigeria was 170,123,740. Of these 75.7 could read and write.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ni.html
Pointing out that the a high percentage of the most intelligent Nigerians compare well with average whites and Orientals in the United States does not prove that the races are innately equivalent in intellectual abilities.
You are what your nickname indicates.
Have you ever been to Ireland? Hell - have you even left the USA at all?
I know you’ve already made up your mind on what the rest of the world is like, but please allow me to try to educate you a bit on Ireland. Ireland has had a very different geographical and historical development than the USA. It is a much smaller country, both in terms of size and population. It has also not had the legacy of plantation slavery using African labor. As such, it has not had and does not have anywhere near the level of racial tension and its associated violence as the USA has had and still does.
To wit, here are two simple citations from Ireland’s Central Statistics Office (CSO). The first is a table of Homicide Offences since 2004. A couple things to note here: the absolute numbers are small - a peak of 138 in 2006, and a low of only 63 in 2011. Using numbers this small to attempt to draw any inferences about homicidal proclivities of the Irish would be problematic. Another point to note is that the list of homicides contains sub-categories for murder, manslaughter, infanticide, and vehicular (“dangerous driving leading to death”). For several of the years listed, murders actually comprised a minority of all homicides.
The second cite gives a breakdown of the Irish population by age and nationality. This would be the closest analogue to US Census statistics which examine data using racial categorizations. Unlike the US Census, the Irish one (I have taken both) does not ask respondents for “race”. (There is another table which examines age and place of birth, but it offers no further racial information than the age & nationality table.) This is most likely due to the different historical factors I alluded to above, such that racial identity of the American variety (i.e. “white” vs. “black”) has never been a major component of Irish society. Concomitantly, the government here (through the offices of the CSO), does not collect and categorize its data in a “racial” manner, unlike the federal US government.
As such, given the paucity of data from which to reasonably draw inferences, it seems as though your assertion “in Ireland blacks have a much higher crime rate than whites,” is not in fact supportable by available evidence. Given that this is the case, perhaps you might wish to retract your claim. Further, given the problems of sample size determination, as well as the fact that you have not provided any breakdown of homicides by category in your interminable CIA citations, you might wish to reconsider whether your other claims, which evidently depend a great deal upon these kinds of statistics, may be equally insupportable.
Because of you and people like you, at least in part.
:eek: Good one! You smart or somethin?
Door one. With an IQ of 72 I would not be admitted to an elite prep school. With an IQ of 145, and as a black person born to poverty, I might get a full tuition scholarship to one of those elite prep schools. From then on personal merit and affirmative action would ease my continued ascent.
None of those links substantiated Doughbag’s assertion. None discredited mine. The differing crime rates for various races are important statistics which in some countries are concealed for reasons of political correctness.
Most blacks do not perform poorly intellectually because people like me think that they do. We think that most of them perform poorly intellectually because all of the evidence indicates that most of them do.
We are not holding blacks back intellectually any more than we are holding them back athletically. When blacks had the opportunity to compete athletically many of them excelled. When blacks had the opportunity to compete academically most revealed their inadequacies.
You can ban us but you cannot disprove what we say about racial differences. If we are banned those differences will persist.
After the Second World War most whites did not want to acknowledge those differences because of the memory of Nazi racial theories. As more time passes since the Second World War, and as the persistence of the differences becomes increasingly difficult to ignore, it will be more difficult for the guardians of political correctness to suppress what a few of us are saying here.
I was on David Duke’s Stormfront for a brief while because I wanted to see if I would be allowed to praise the Jews and criticize Hitler. I was not permitted to.
And considering how strongly crime rates correlate to economic data, I think one can’t draw any decent conclusion using crime data for poor countries (and if we did try and draw a conclusion, we must conclude that Central Americans are the most innately violent people on earth).
And others have posted studies showing no gap.
I think you mean 75.7 percent. And again, you have no data that shows that the “races” are not innately equivalent in intellectual abilities- all you have is the achievement gap, which has persisted (or shrunk according to many sources) for all of the last few decades (the only decades in which we have decent testing data).
As far as Nigeria- compare Nigeria now to China in the late 1980s: both of their literacy rates were around 75%, both of their per-capita GDPs were in the same ballpark(PPP $1K-2K). Both economies have and had high rates of GDP increase per year, and both have and had large, booming populations.
Are we to conclude that the average IQ in China 25 years ago was the same as Nigeria now? I say that this economic (and literacy) data says nothing about average IQs. All it describes is two large countries with growing populations and growing economies.
My point is that one can compare economic data to make any point you like- and the same goes for crime and literacy data. All that data speaks to is economics, crime, and literacy. It says nothing about IQs, never can, and never will. The only thing that says anything about IQs is IQ testing, and the only thing that says anything about a genetic tendency towards high or low IQs and crime rates is genetic data. You have zero genetic data, and very poor IQ testing data.
All you’ve shown is the achievement gap. It’s your hatred of black people that drives your conclusions- not the data, because there is none supporting your explanation.
Did you enjoy posting with others who shared your hatred of black people? Did it make you feel better to freely post how they are “savages” who spread their “savagery” in every country they go to?