SDMB Bigoted Asshole Omnibus Thread

Those who flame me are bullies and cowards. They want to suppress a honest and public discussion of black crime, black illegitimacy, and inferior black intellectual performance.

I want to have that discussion frequently and on television. Those who maintain that blacks are not responsible for their shortcomings should be part of the discussion, but they should be expected to present civil and rational arguments. There are too many taboos against criticizing blacks. What we need is a real dialogue on race.

Dude, you are not holding up your end of an ‘honest’ discussion, else you would *honestly *consider the arguments offered you. You are either unable or unwilling, and I guess it doesn’t really matter which.
You may be wrong, but my God you are not uncertain!

You really don’t. You can’t even manage it here in a lone internet forum. Mass media would eat you alive.

An impartial observer would conclude that I manage it well here. I respond calmly and politely to some real vile abuse. What I mean however, is that there should be no taboos against biological explanations of human behavior and potential.

Hardly likely.

Yes, because “not reflexively dismiss” and “actively promote while ignoring all evidence to the contrary” are the same thing.

There are no taboos. But your claims about genetics require genetic evidence to support them. Otherwise it’s just conjecture.

Calmly irrational is still irrational. If you could actually provide rational evidence of your opinion, then maybe you would have had a better reception.

You’re stupid and you have a little dick.

Also, do you know what a confound is, scientifically speaking?

How are you being suppressed? You’re still talking.

It doesn’t affect the merits of my argument one way or another, but just to demonstrate that you are wrong (and self-deluded), I’m prepared to bet you $5,000 (five thousand dollars) on this.

You must agree to keep my identity confidential, and you can pick out 3 board-certified psychiatrists in the New York City area. I will pick one of them to visit at your expense. We will each put up five thousand dollars to be held by a neutral party we both agree on. I will also put up an extra $300 so you will be reimbursed for the cost of the psychiatrist if you win the bet.

If the psychiatrist diagnoses me as autistic, the $10,300 will be turned over to you. Otherwise, the money will be turned over to me.

And by the way, it’s telling that you chose to diagnose me with autism since one of the classic traits of autism is an inability to pick up on social cues. Of course the main argument, so to speak, on your side of the debate is that those who speak the truth about racial differences are mercilessly ostracized.

Probably everyone who challenges popular dogma is the subject of similar accusations.

I agree. The definition of “racist” and “racism” (and whether I fall within that definition) is irrelevant to the underlying issue of the extent to which black underachievement is the result of genetics.

However, the lack of evidence is not. There’s zero evidence for this genetic explanation.

Yeah, about that “genetics” stuff…

You post “rules of conduct to interacting with you” on some blog, “ban” people, adopt fringe race theories, blame “liberals” for your own rhetorical impotence, and then wonder why people think you have a mental disease?

If what you have isn’t some psychological problem then you’re simply a pathetic person. Why do you subject yourself to all this abuse? “Banning people?” :confused:

I never made any pretense of being calm. The entire purpose of the BBQ Pit is to tell people when they piss you off. You piss me off, because you are so obtuse and not only are you a virulent racist, you have the gall to pretend it’s a rational position to take. So I’m pissed off on behalf of the people you denigrate and the scientific method you fuck repeatedly in the ass every time you open your mouth. Being angry does not make me wrong, and pretending to be calm and rational when you are a seething cesspool of hatred does not make you right. Emotion is critical to man’s ability to reason. Maybe if you cracked open a goddamn book once in a while you’d know that.

“Hi, is this Dr. _____? My name’s Evil Economist… you don’t know me, but earlier this week you saw a patient, and I just need to find out whether you diagnosed him as autistic. Yes… yes, I know about doctor-patient confidentiality… yes I’m aware you could lose your license, but the thing is, I know this guy from a message board and we have a bet going… hello? Hello, can you hear me?”

Lol, I don’t wonder at all. If somebody is self-deluded enough to deny the reality of racial differences, it will naturally seem to them that there is something wrong with someone who expresses the truth in contravention of the Taboo.

By the way, please show me an example of this: “, blame “liberals” for your own rhetorical impotence”

I dunno. I said I’d support NDD’s banning and I meant it. There’s something to be said for honest dialog, true, but he’s demonstrated he’s incapable of that. He is the antithesis of fighting ignorance. Some people are racist, and some people are… fucking racist. I’ve never felt this much animosity toward any other poster. My reason for not wanting him around is pretty selfish. I just fucking hate him.

How 'bout we just dispense with the unnecessary legwork, as the diagnosis is clear from your thousands of posts here, hand over the 10k, and we’ll all call it a day?

It’s cool though, autism is genetic. Nothing to be ashamed about.

HEY EVERYONE, DRINKS ARE ON ME!