Lol at excuse number 341 for black underperformance. Good thing the blacks in Haiti don’t have whitey keeping them down.
Then it should be no problem for you to quote 3 “lies” I have told.
Please do so. Failing that, please admit I have done no so thing and apologize.
If whites keep blacks down, why do blacks have higher standards of living in countries where the majority is white?
The per capita gross domestic product of Haiti is $1,200. This is one of the lowest in the world, and lower than for any country in Latin America. Nearly all of the countries with lower standards of living than Haiti are Negro countries.
Haiti shares an island with the Dominican Republic. The black population there is much lower. The per capita gross domestic product in the Dominican Republic is $9,300.
I have read that one flying over that island can easily tell the border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Haiti is red from deforested soil. The Dominican Republic is lush and green.
“A point refuted a thousand times, commonly abbreviated as PRATT, is a common phrase on internet forums where debates have a tendency to go in circles. Once people have refuted a point the first thousand times, it’s hard for them to muster the motivation to do it again.”
No one has ever refuted my argument that racial differences exist of a significant extent and durability to demonstrate genetic differences.
Instead I get the silly cliche that “race is only a social construct,” and the assertion that at some undisclosed time in the future the various under performing non races will perform and behave as well as the non races of whites and Orientals do now.
Well the other thing about Haiti is that the blacks there chased out and slaughtered all of the whites more than 200 years ago. Making it difficult to blame their current problems on whites.
Although I’m confident that the Liberal Excuse Machine will come up with something.
Congratulations on knowing absolutely nothing about the completely different histories of the two countries.
To me just the fact that what the experts report on the loss of ice in the poles does not match what brazil claims should be enough to show who is really the liar, as it was the denial that there is plenty of evidence for the water vapor feedback with CO2.
That NDD is still trying to depend on the brazil nut is even more sad, but what it is clear to me now is that instead of dealing with what **Colibri **reported NDD just shows that he is a coward in the end by replying to a post from yesterday, since he is incapable of dealing with the expert there is noting much left to say.
We’ve refuted your definition of race, multiple times. And you’ve demonstrated zero genetic differences. A persistently lower murder rate for the Amish is not evidence of Amish genetics providing less tendency towards murder. Education, economic, and crime statistics say nothing about genetics, and never can.
Note that brazil84 has “elected” to avoid substantiating his ridiculous claim that I lied or contradicted myself.
I don’t read or respond to this individual’s posts due to his past refusal to answer a simple, reasonable question about his position. I simply have no interest in engaging with someone who insists on hiding his position behind a cloak of ambiguity.
This poster is on my ignore list due to his refusal to answer simple questions about his position. I am happy to provide links and quotes to anyone who is not on my ignore list.
He’s on your ignore list, yet you read his post. In addition to not understanding the word “contradiction”, I don’t think you understand the word “ignore”.
No you have not. Repeating an untruth does not turn it into a truth. Races differ by appearance, by evolutionary history and pre history, by skeleton characteristics, by DNA, and by average ability levels and behavior.
Prove that blacks behave and perform as well as whites.
You’ve refused any question “testing” your statements about race. What race are Nubians? What race are Andaman Islanders? What race are Malagasy? What race are Ainu? What race are the Naga of Sri Lanka?
You’ve essentially made a hypothesis that could be evaluated scientifically- your hypothesis is “genetic differences between populations account for most or all of the ‘achievement gap’ between ‘blacks’ and ‘whites’”. A good scientist would ask how to test this hypothesis. All you have done is restate it in various ways.
That’s not what you said originally. You stated that any achievement gap was “largely” due to genetics.
Now, you’re changing your story?
An achievement gap exists in the US (though not everywhere in the world).
What you have NOT done is shown that such a gap is due to genetics and not other social or economic factors.
Sorry, but when an expert on the matter is not impressed with your “dizzying” intellect and you just insist on posting misleading information, it is you who is the one that has trouble with the truth.
This is made worse by the fact that brazil just demonstrated what a coward he really is.
So please explain to **Colibri **how your ideas will make headway were it counts by replying to his post or just shut up.
He’s already expressed a belief that it’s been somehow proven that the gap always (or at least extremely consistently) exists, no matter location and cultural/societal circumstance, and that therefore proves that it must be genetic.
He’s already been told that such is not actually been proven, and that even it had been that STILL doesn’t necessarily make it genetic, but he doesn’t believe it.
Thus this endless circle.
If you’re going to ignore someone, then ignore them. I was going to comment that repeatedly pointing out that you’re not reading someone’s posts by quoting their post is the stupidest thing you’ve done in this thread, but sadly it doesn’t even make the top ten.