I’d like to go on record here as opining that I think it’s going to turn out to be a really bad idea to have one set of unique titles for all those fortunate enough to have gotten in on the ground floor of this one-time-only introductory offer of $4.95 subscription rates. I’m going to feel ashamed of myself forever after–seriously–if there’s any kind of differentiation in the future between my (hardly) exalted so-called “charter member” status and that of the mere plebes who either didn’t happen to be onboard before April 22, 2004, or who didn’t get the credit card limbered up in time, but who did eventually subscribe.
I’m not talking about differentiating between those who have paid, period, and “guests” who are exercising their 30-days-free option. I’m talking about differentiating between those who will have paid before April 22, 2004, and those who will have paid after that date.
Also, there are inevitably going to be a number of SDMB regulars who are going to be “left behind” in this, due to being off the boards during this crucial month, because of illness or job changes or whatever, and it’s going to be bad enough for them to come back and find out that they’ll have to fork over $15 for what the rest of us were lucky enough to get for $5, without also having to endure the annoyance of seeing that all the rest of us–who just happened to be here in time to sign up for $4.95–get to put special member titles under our names, and they don’t.
The thing I’m objecting to–and I think a number of other people would join me in this–is not the designation “charter” member–not just the word “charter”–so much as the simple indication that there’s a difference between two segments of the SDMB, and, one segment of which couldn’t do much about it, being either not registered yet, or simply unfortunately not around when it all went down.
If, when I registered here in the spring of 2000 I had seen that all those who were members of the old AOL board (denoted by their March 1999 registration dates) had had “Original Doper” instead of “Member” under their names, I’d have been subtly put off by the suggestion of elitism, and I probably wouldn’t have hung around, feeling that no matter what I did, I’d never be able to fit in, or be able to catch up to all the “insiders”, all the “Original Dopers”, who were Original Dopers solely by virtue of them having been involved with the Cecil Adams and his Straight Dope column before I was.
I don’t have any particular suggestions other than either “Member” or “Subscriber” for everyone in general who has paid, and then possibly (if the software will accommodate it) allow those who have paid to compose their own custom member titles if they don’t like “Member” or “Subscriber”, within the bounds of reasonable good taste, to be determined by Lynn or Tuba. This is what the JREF boards do–when you join the JREF Foundation, you get the title “JREF Kid” on the message board, and if you don’t like that, you can make up your own title.