I think there are enough Packers, Bears, Vikings, and yes, even Lions fans to create a discussion thread for what should be one of the most intriguing division in football.
My disclaimer: I am a Packers fan.
So I will now give my breakdown of the NFC North, by position:
Quarterback: 1) GB (Aaron Rodgers); 2) CHI (Jay Cutler); 3) MIN (Brett Favre); 4) DET (Daunte Culpepper/Matt Stafford)
QB is where the division gets most of its intrigue, of course. Rodgers had an excellent season last year and has looked sharp in the pre-season, so I give him the nod. Cutler is young and accomplished, but coming into a new situation, with less receiving talent than he had in Denver. Brett Favre is a wildcard, but he is clearly older and doing more dinking and dunking these days. The Lions QB potential is the future, not this year.
Running Back: 1. MIN (Adrian Peterson AND Chester Taylor); 2) CHI (Matt Forte); 3) GB (Ryan Grant); 4) DET (Kevin Smith)
While it is clear that AP is the cream of the crop, the distance between him and Forte is not that great, but t he addition of Taylor in the Minnesota backfield just makes it more intimidating. Grant disappointed for much of last year but came on strong and could pull himself closer to the elite two. Kevin Smith showed flashes last year, but unfortunately for him the team was behind a lot and he didn’t get to showcase himself.
Wide Receivers: 1. GB (Greg Jennings, Donald Driver, James Jones); 2) DET (Calvin Johnson, Bryant Johnson, Dennis Northcutt); 3) MIN (Bernard Berrian, Percy Harvin, Sidney Rice); 4) CHI (Devin Hester, Earl Bennet, Joaquin Iglesias)
The surprise here for some would be Detroit at #2. But I think the presence of an elite receiver in Calvin Johnson is the slight difference over Minnesota. Percy Harvin is potential, but it remains to be seen how he will do. GB has the best proven wide receiver corps, I think and I cannot even comment on the Bears as I have no idea who some these guys are.
Tight Ends: 1. CHI (Greg Olsen); 2) MIN (Visanthe Shiancoe); 3) GB (Donald Lee); 4) DET (Casey Fitzsimmons)
Greg Olsen should emerge this year under Cutler, who made excellent use of his TE while in Denver. Likewise Brett Favre will depend quite a bit on Shiancoe. I give Olsen a slight advantage in his play making ability, but its close. Donald Lee is dependable but not a main option. Casey Fitzsimmons is I don’t know.
Offensive Line: 1) MIN; 2) GB; 3) CHI; 4) DET
Bryan McKinnie and steve Hutchinson is all you really need to know about the Minnesota O-line which is one of the best run-blocking lines in the league. The Packers should improve there mid-level O-line do to consistency of playing together in their second year. The Bears are trying to add a few pieces to strengthen a mediocre line. The Lions were probably the worst O-line in the league last year.
Defensive Line: 1) Min; 2) Chi; 3) GB; 4) DET
Jared Allen is a beast and a second-to-none rush defense puts Minnesota easily at the top of this list. While I think GB will be pretty good (hints in the pre-season), they are switching to a 3-4 which presents uncertainty. However, Dom Capers as D coach is probably the best offseason pickup in the Division. The Bears O-line is strong, if not spectacular. The Lions again bring up the rear.
Linebackers: 1) CHI; 2) GB; 3) MIN; 4) DET
The top three here are very close and I would put only the slightest amount of breath between them. Chicago has Lance Briggs and Brian Urlacher, the Vikings have Chad Greenway and EJ Henderson, the Packers have AJ Hawk and Nick Barnett. These rankings I would not go to the mat over, it is close, but the Bears get the edge.
Defesnive Backfield: 1) MIN; 2) GB ; 3) CHI; 4) DET
Minnesota and GB both have talented, but flawed Defensive backfield. The Vikings DBs are excellent tacklers and can hit hard (Greenway and Winfield) but lag behind in interceptions. The Packers likewise have some good tacklers and some very good ball hawking skills, but are poor in coverage. Chicago and Detroit I don’t even know who they have on DB, so I am guessing there to be honest.
Special Teams Push
If the Bears let Devin Hester return punts, then they would be the number one, but I am getting the impression they won’t since they need him as a receiving option. Other than that, I don’t see any reason to try and differentiate the squads.
Coaching Pass
I don’t think any of the coaches in the the NFC North have particularly distinguished themselves at this point or proven themselves incompetent.
Intangibles TBD
Really you cannot predict intangibles to be honest. What will be the reaction to QB changes in Chicago and Minnesota? GBs new 3-4, will it work? Who is hungry? etc.
Now we know the teams. How will they finish? We need to look at the schedule to really know. Well I am going to assume, for no reason other than I can, that they split the intra-division schedule, so each team is 3-3 (yes, that includes the Lions). It is not a prediction of those games, but more a leveling the playing field:
Chicago Bears 8-8
9/13 – @ Green Bay (L)
9/20 – vs. Pittsburgh (L)
9/27 – @ Seattle (L)
10/4 – vs. Detroit (W)
10/11 – BYE
10/18 – @ Atlanta (L)
10/25 – @ Cincinnati (W)
11/1 – vs. Cleveland (W)
11/8 – vs. Arizona (W)
11/12 – @ San Francisco (L)
11/22 – vs. Philadelphia (W)
11/29 – @ Minnesota (L)
12/6 – vs. St. Louis (W)
12/13 – vs. Green Bay (W)
12/20 – @ Baltimore(L)
12/28 – vs. Minnesota (W)
1/3 – @ Detroit (L)
i have the Bears losing twice when the go out west, especially since they have four days leading up to the 49ers game. On the flip side they get 10 days to play Philly at home.
Detroit Lions (6-10)
9/13 @ New Orleans (L)
9/20 Minnesota (W)
9/27 Washington - (L)
10/4 @ Chicago (L)
10/11 Pittsburgh (L)
10/18 @ Green Bay (L)
7 - BYE
11/1 St. Louis (W)
11/8 @ Seattle (L)
11/15 @ Minnesota (L)
11/22 Cleveland (W)
11/26 Green Bay (W)
12/6 @ Cincinnati (W)
12/13 @ Baltimore (L)
12/20 Arizona (L)
12/27 @ San Francisco (L)
1/3 Chicago (W)
I am giving the Lions three wins outside the division including a road win against Cincy. If I were a betting man I would bet under the six, though.
Green Bay 10-6
9/13 Chicago (W)
9/20 Cincinnati (W)
9/27 @ St. Louis Rams (W)
10/5 @ Minnesota Vikings (L)
10/11 BYE
10/18 Detoit (W)
10/25 @ Cleveland Browns (W)
11/1 Minnesota(W)
11/8 @ Tampa Bay Buccaneers (L)
11/15 Dallas (W)
11/22 San Francisco (W)
11/26 @ Detroit (L)
11/7 Baltimore (W)
1213 @ Chicago (L)
12/20 @ Pittsburgh (L)
12/27 Seattle (W)
1/3 @ Arizona (L)
A lot of 50-50 games there I think, so the Packers could be 7-9 or 13-3 even. But ten wins sounds about right.
Minnesota 10-6
9/13 @ Cleveland (W)
9/20 @ Detroit (L)
9/27 San Francisco (W)
10/5 Green Bay (W)
10/11 @ St. Louis Rams (W)
10/18 Baltimore (W)
10/25 @ Pittsburgh Steelers (L)
11/1 @ Green Bay Packers (L)
11/8 BYE
11/15 Detroit (W)
11/22 Seattle (W)
11/29 Chicago (W)
12/6 @Arizona (L)
12/13 Cincinnati (W)
12/20 @ Carolina Panthers (L)
12/28 @ Chicago (L)
1/3 New York Giants (W)
Big game potential there on January 3, when the Giants and the Vikes could be battling for NFC playoff position.
So the final standings:
Green Bay 10-6
Minnesota 10-6
Chicago 8-8
Detroit 5-11
Green Bay finishes ahead, I think because of the slightly better NFC record. But it is pure speculation really.