Serdar Argic's cousin is a member of the SDMB

Spluttering incoherently, that is.

Looks interesting. I’ll pick it up, and let you know what I think. :slight_smile:

It really is an amazing book. And now I’m annoyed… I’ve been building my personal library since I was a young teenager and by this point it’s too big to fit on the book shelves I have, so most of it is boxed up and scattered across two states and three cities. I read The Pledge a decade and a half ago by now since it was given to me as a gift when I became bar mitzvah… I’m hazy on many of the specifics and I’d really like to re-read it now.

Grumble grumble feh.

Anyways, yah, let me know what you think. Hopefully I’ll have found the sucker by then.

Edit: Ahahahahahaha, found my copy… now I just need to spend the next several hours cleaning things up again :smiley:

Hey I sympathize.

I currently have a whole room devoted to library and it is too small, I have books double-parked on all shelves and piles on the floor - and this after I’ve carefully purged the books with the ruthelessness of a devoted Stalinist (and a lot more discrimination). :smiley: I can’t find anything.

In the next two years I plan on building an addition on my house; my ultimate dream is to build a really nice library with built-in shelves, a little ladder to reach the top shelves, and a skylight … which, should it ever happen, will no doubt prove too small in short order.

Yah… I’m going to start my own purge later tonight. Going through things I found way too many old grad school textbooks that I won’t need and old paperbacks which aren’t good for much other than poolside reading. I wonder if any of my local libraries/schools could use them.

Meanwhile, an interesting tidbit, but this isn’t the copy I had back then (I have no idea where it is). I got this one in… the late 90’s I think? I feel kinda bad about how battered it is, actually, but lugging it around through the years has taken a toll. It’s irreplaceable, however. It’s not a commercial version and is labeled ‘not for resale’ . The back leaf is marked

“This book is a gift
presented to you by
Air Force House
Herzelia
Israel”

The front has a copy of a letter drafted in Haifa, 1957, by Yaacov Dori to one of my relatives (a major protagonist in the book)

Which is part of how I know what I know about some bits of Israel’s history. These were the ‘bedtime stories’ I grew up with as a child. Being told the history, first hand, by one of the men who helped create it is something of a benefit :wink:

You constantly mistake it when you are too stupid to understand with the incoherence of your opponent. The big mistake anyone makes with you is actually taking you seriously at all. The reason I stopped talking to you in the Battlestar Galactica thread is because I couldn’t believe what an utter imbecile you were in that discussion. You were literally too stupid to understand what I was trying to say. I haven’t seen the thread in question, but after my many interactions with you, I am going to from now on take my chances and assume that in 100% of cases the misunderstanding is your doing. I’m willing to be wrong the 1% of times that you actually do show some logical coherence.

Woah, that’s amazing.

When I read the book, I’m going to try to guess which is your relation. :smiley:

Here’s the thread in issue: http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11250344#post11250344

The highlight is our mutual friend ElvisL1ves taking extreme offense at my use of the expression “having the wolf by the ears” in reference to the Israel-Palestine situation on the WB. He took this to mean Israelis literally thought Palestinians were subhuman, and could not be moved from this POV.

So yes, I think you are quite accurate - he’s simply too stupid to understand what is under discussion (or alternatively, deliberately plays being stupid for laughs).

Not “Israelis”, you. YOU. It was your own analogy. When asked if YOU could consider any other analogy, one that did not portray other humans as animals, YOU could not.

Perhaps you ought to go back and reread your own spluttering before you get caught in any more such silly lies.

Less schmuck, more mensch, bubbeleh. :rolleyes:

It was actually Thomas Jefferson’s analogy. His quote about slavery is actually pretty apropos to the Israeli-Palestinian situation:

Dude. :smiley:

Well done Malthus. I particularly like this line:

Though I have to say you are the real moran! You mispelled metaphors! ;p

Jefferson was referring to an institution, not a people. Makes a difference, doesn’t it?

Malthus and FinnAgain are, as they showed in that thread, self-blinded to the point of being unable to consider Arabs even as fellow human beings. mswas has the same problem with homosexuals. And, when that is pointed out to them, the only response either can muster is elementary-school level, as this thread shows.

Thanks; I’m glad someone liked it. I sorta knew it would be lost on ElvisL1ves. Pearls before swine and all that! :smiley:

As for the typo - I feel remorse in direct proportion to the offense. :wink:

Malthus in the other thread wasn’t referring to the Palestinians as a people. He was talking about Israel’s occupation of the West Bank. He said:

So he’s saying the West Bank is the wolf in the analogy (which he maybe tortured a little bit). Israel is occupying it, and doesn’t really have any good options in dealing with it, is what he’s saying. That doesn’t mean that he believes the Palestinians are animals.

I’d like to see a cite that proves that I have a problem seeing homosexuals as human beings. :wink:

Of course it was, that’s not a big surprise.

Ok, well as long as you’re remorseless. :wink:

Good luck with that. :smiley:

I started down this path, thinking that ElvisL1ves was maybe just a little bit misinformed, maybe not familiar with the expression.

It took me awhile to realize that ElvisL1ves has that particular form of stupidity that makes it apparently impossible for him to back down, having once taken umbrage. In his mind, it cannot be that the offense was not warranted - it must be that I really am “… unable to consider Arabs even as fellow human beings”, as revealed by my choice of expression.

[QUOTE=Captain Amazing;11283540So he’s saying the West Bank is the wolf in the analogy (which he maybe tortured a little bit). Israel is occupying it, and doesn’t really have any good options in dealing with it, is what he’s saying. That doesn’t mean that he believes the Palestinians are animals.[/QUOTE]

Then you should have kept on reading. He makes it quite clear.

Not that I’d recommend that to most people, but since you wish to pass judgment, you need to get it right.
mswas, there are dozens of pages of your posts alone in the various gay marriage threads where you do pretty much that, refusing to acknowledge that any of your rationalizations have any foundation other than that. I would add the term “as you know”, but that’s where the self-blinding problem comes into it.

The elementary-school level problem with your responses was already apparent, and you didn’t need to provide additional evidence.

I did read the rest of the thread, and I think you’re being oversensitive on the Palestinian’s behalf.