[QUOTE=Soapbox Monkey]
I guess the concern is that, if I (or any hypothetical guy who simply doesn’t have luck with women) end up finally getting with someone in my late 20s/early 30s, someone who had a particularly wild past,** but aren’t willing to be wild or particularly adventurous in bed**, it would be a deal breaker. Now if she’s someone who never had a very wild past it would be different, but if the girls attitude is “been there, done that, didn’t really like that* too much, so even though this is your first sexual relationship and you’d like to try it, that’s too bad because I wouldn’t want to try it again, sorry” then that would be a deal breaker for me.
[/QUOTE]
You do realize that sometimes its not the position but the location. She might be old enough that by the dashboard lights are just killing her back.
[QUOTE=Soapbox Monkey]
Why should I have to settle for some girl who used to be open and adventerous but is looking for something more “tame” now. I’m not saying that there are very many women like this, or even any at all, but it’s something I’d be concerned about if I’m supposed to just sit tight and wait for the women my age to “mature and realize what they’re missing out on with a guy like me.”
[/QUOTE]
Again, are you certain that no more open and adventerous does not mean wife swapping , orgies , and getting banged in a dive washroom littered with syringes , is that the kind of adventer you want.
[QUOTE=Soapbox Monkey]
I don’t want to be anyone’s safe, secure, backup guy. Through all my bitterness over these past few years, I’ve remained a hopeless (perhaps too hopeless) romantic, and would rather wait for a girl who’s passionate about me, and not just deciding “eh, sure I’ll give him a shot since I’ve got nothing better to do.”
[/QUOTE]
Or their last best hope to get it right .
Some how I think you will finally find happiness with whomever you meet,but it may not be until your in your forties.
Declan