So you're suddenly an expert - Gaaah! is there a name for this sort of behaviour?

My first Pit thread, and possibly too mild to be pit-worthy, but something annoying keeps happening.

Somebody will post a question (we’re talking GQ here, it’s facts they are after).

Somebody (sometimes me) will answer it (or try to)

The Orignal poster then either:
[li]Disagrees with the answer they were given.[/li][li]Turns out to know the answer anyway, but just wanted to belittle anyone who gave a simplistic answer.[/li]
So you asked a question, but now your an expert eh?
<sound of Mangetout’s blood boiling>

Look, I try to answer questions, sometimes I get it wrong, I don’t mind if somebody corrects me, I might even learn something, but it seriously pisses me off if the person correcting me is the one who asked the bloody question.

What’s with this bloody pretence business?, does this behaviour have a name?
[sup](it’s not quite the same as trolling, is it?)[/sup]

Happened to me just yesterday. Several people, including myself, answered the question correctly. The OP then came back and disagreed, now intent on believing the exact opposite. It would have been different if he had made an argument or introduced new information… but no, he just wanted the other answer. I’ll not link the thread and embarrass the newbie OP. I hopefully I set him straight.

This phenomenon is worthy of a term. How about Dissenting Revelation or Contrary Savant?

I have always been a fan of “intentionally obtuse.”

How about Satanism [sym]y[/sym] ???

<—turns off SarcasMeter.

Show-oafs?

Or (stealing a gag from Clive Anderson) we could call them Mr. Spooner’s Shining Wits.

Could it be a sub-version of Male Answer Syndrome?

MAS = The inability of a male to NOT answer any question. Just try asking a male if he knows how much candy was imported by Poland last year. He can’t say, “Nope, no idea.”, he will have to try and answer.

Not QUITE the same, but it is annoying, and it might be jerkism.

I don’t believe that we have a specific name for this behavior (I’m American, no U in there) but if I see it, I’ll call the OP on it.

Lynn

How about a Vos Savant?

Why, so you can be Mr. Smarty-Pants and call people complex names?
:stuck_out_tongue:

“Invincible Ignorance.”

In the field of ethics (and I believe also theology), it’s called feigned ignorance.

no, just so I can say “aha, another case of XYZ” and leave it at that.
:stuck_out_tongue:

I think I’ll go with that. thanks Lib.

how about “85”

it fits

eh?

::sigh::
Mangetout, you should have shouted “WRONG!” and gone on to belittle Libertarian’s vocabulary and knowledge of ethics.

:smiley:

Well, it woulda made me laugh…

i believe “The Deeper Meaning of Liff” by Douglas Adams & John Lloyd (yes, that IS the correct spelling) holds the answer to your question.

from one of the alien flicks, there was a dumb prison guard whos nickname was 85, turned out it was his iq. nice obscure you can say like its an insult and get the eh? in response.

How serendipitous, as I look right now the above is your 85th post.
Why Uri Geller would think that was amazing.