Yes, let’s harken back to the days of yesteryear, when any woman with a strong opinion was “hysterical” and in need of therapeutic uterus manipulation to calm her down. That’s just what you’re suggesting, just in different terms. Everything would be fine if Ann just got a little more dick. Let’s get a fake one, that’ll do.
Why can’t you disagree with her on the merits of her argument or lack thereof, instead of diminishing her in the same old tired, cliched, sexist way that men have been dealing with thinking women for centuries?
From the women who said we need to execute John Walker in order to prevent liberals from becoming traitors, I think she is long passed the “strong opinion” phase and well into the “totally insane” phase.
Are you actually familiar with the “work” of “conquer their country and force them to convert ot Christianity” Coulter? She has no points to rebut. She gets work because she is so outrageous that various publishers know that she will spark (irate) readership. She has already lost a couple of jobs with conservative publications because her irrationality outstripped that of the most biased readers. (Not a statement that conservatives are biased, but readers among conservatives hold opinions across a spectrum and hers are out beyond the lunatic fringe of theirs.)
beagledave simply noted the number of references that a good Freudian would discern in her latest spewings and posted an amusing Pit thread on the subject.
This thread is not about rebutting a “woman with a strong opinion” but about mocking one of the most insanely foolish writers currently working in the American scene.
“We can ride elevators and quarter-mile into the sky and have dinner. What can they do.”
Thank God, that the Cold War is over, otherwise we’d be building ever-taller buildings with ever-higher restaurants with ever-snootier waiters in competitions with the Soviets. Eventually we’d build a building so tall with a restaurant so snooty that no one could be served.
I am still looking forward to the day that Ms. Coulter, or someone of her ilk, announces that not only are liberals a Fifth Column that needs to be restrained by an occasional judicial homicide, but that the Civil Liberties Union actually planned the September highjackings. I would not put it beyond her.
Incidentally, Ms. Coulter would still be a nut case if she had testicles and a three-day growth of beard. We have grown immune to shock humor, I suppose we will develop an immunity to shock political commentary. That will happen when we find the roots of both in a lack of original thought and sophomoric sensibilities. So there!
Really? Would this be along the lines of a Patriot missle, the kind that failed so spectacularly during the Persian Gulf war?
And let’s just enter candyland for a moment and say that this fabulous military technology DID work and destroyed the incoming missles before they hit the new & improved WTT’s.
Answer me this then: Where would the debris from the missles fall, or rather onto how many buildings in lower Manhattan would it fall and how much damage would those smaller buildings sustain?
Or am I just being an asshole for quibbling over such a “minor detail?”
Honestly, this is perhaps THE stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. It is so insanely ignorant on so many levels, that I am literally astonished that any person with enough intelligence to use a keyboard could really believe this. I suppose it’s possible Ann Coulter dictates this stuff from a brain damage ward somewhere, but I strongly suspect she’s seeing if she can make a living tweaking people.
She probably makes a very good living at it. She probably also takes that to mean that she is validated and that people eagerly await their chance to be dazzled by her brilliance. I used to think she was pulling our chains but now I think she really believes the garbage she puts out.