Surely you understand the distinction between the government forcing media organizations to act a certain way, and the legal system being called on to judge whether a contract is being breached. Surely.
There’s no contract. Fox had the right to hold any debate they wanted. They have the right to promote any candidate they want, should they desire to.
And they can still call themselves a News channel, too. 
I can call myself a news channel. That’s what freedom of the press is.
And we can all laugh and point. Which we do.
While the author can hardly be described as “liberal” (at least in the American sense of the term), he also isn’t a Republican sadly enough, so I’m forced to put this vile article here which encourages the Democratic Party to spit on their historic base.
That’s the third provocative article by a liberal writer this week alone, along with Rauch’s argument that we have too much democracy and transparency and a Vox writer saying the Revolution was a mistake.
I think all three articles are wrong, but I wouldn’t call any of them stupid. The arguments are intelligent and they make good points.
the idea that calling Radical Islam what it is would somehow hurt American security, or that there’s any moral equivalence between Israel building settlements as a bargaining chip and Palestinian terrorist evil jihad. Worst ideas from the far left, ever, besides communism.
Run that by me again?
Would it somehow help?
If conservatives want to start a second Crusade, they’ll have to do it without liberals’ help.
What would be accomplished by saying “Radical Islam?” Would those words said together send ISIS back to the Fifth Dimension?
It’s a fucking name. Not magic words.What exactly would be accomplished by Obama saying “Radical Islam?” What would change?
The thing that they are angry at him about.
He could also try “Rumplestiltskin,” which would be just about as effective.
People like DM00 seem to be quite attached to this one, so they’d probably insist that he left out a syllable. Or had his fingers crossed. Or had a gold fringe in his pocket. Or something.
I think it would be good for quite a laugh if Obama said it a few times, but winked each time he said it. Right wing radio waves would be hot enough to feel!
Would we suddenly be able to defeat them with no more blood being spilled? If saying those two words would accomplish that, I’d get the motherfuckers tattooed on my forehead. The Right’s obsession with this is a solution in search of a problem.
They’d then insist he said “militant radical islamic jihadi terrorism.”
Also, why isn’t he wearing his flag pin? Plus I’m pretty sure I saw him in a head scarf once.
By not saying “Islam”, they believe that the president is saying that the religion in general is not the problem. Which he is, but they don’t agree. They think saying the words are the first step in getting people to agree that Muslims in general are the problem, and “taking care” of that problem once and for all.
It’s really as simple as that.
Remember, these are also the same sort of people who believe all that “Freedork on the Land” bullshit, with all the Magic Words that implies.
Reality is confusing, complicated and generally out of their control. They NEED that magic shortcut so it must be totally true! I’ve found this an applicable principle no matter if we’re talking SovCits or Islamophobes.