To be clear, I didn’t think it was necessarily incorrect, just that he probably had some reason to avoid including a link, such as not wanting to mention that the quote dates to 2008.
More power to the poster in question if he feels he’s got some material to prop up the thread. Let’s do it properly, is all I’m sayin’.
Schumer opposed Trump judicial nominee Marvin Quattlebaum because of the color of his skin. The Dem’s leader in the Senate is apparently is a throwback to the Democrats of the segregation era.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Oh, now the source is youtube? Great.
FTN
There’s a bit more to it, unsurprisingly.
Wanna try again?
Ninja’d by ElvisL1evs.
You don’t need to copy Tucker Carlson’s tweet.
CNN’s take is that Schumer is pissed that his two previous non-white nominees got blocked, so he voted against Quattlebaum, who passed by 41 votes anyway. Another political pissing contest.
Not surprisingly, you are attributing words from Shumer not Graham
“I judge nominees on the content of their character, not the color of their skin,” Graham said Thursday. “Chuck Schumer should do the same.”
Wanna try again?
Schumer pissed on his shoe!
And Schumer said: “It was saying that I thought this nominee was not very a good nominee to begin with.” So you believe the Republican who claims the decision was made for race reasons, even though the person who made the decision explicitly says it wasn’t. OK, I guess.
To be fair, the republican is probably a gun owner, and being a gun owner gives one telepathic powers.
Appropriately, since your original post was about Schumer’s character and reasons. Why would you take someone else’s word for it and not listen to his own? Is it simply a lie if you didn’t hear it from Hannity?
Did that apply during the last administration, for the nominees put forward for this position? Obviously not - that’s the problem Schumer was pointing out.
When you get fooled by one of your Fake News sources, it’s usually best to acknowledge it and learn for the future, not try to bluster your way out of it. You have much to learn.
.
Wait…Lindsay Graham is calling Chuck Schumer a racist?
.
The is the era of Trump Truth. Which is lies. Which is all you can expect from the tard party.
Seems to be a fairly dead on Clothahump impersonation.
I was thinking Oakrahoma.
At least she is not calling him a homophobe. That would be just too much cog-dis.
Foxnews report on Schumer’s statement 3/1/2018
The truth
CNN Schumer’s interview 3/2/2018
backpedaling, Too little, too late!
“Fake News”
propaganda must harp on a few simple slogans appealing to “the primitive sentiments of the broad masses”.
Wacko Liberal Idea
I propose a limitation be put on how many sqares [sic] of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don’t want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required. – Sheryl Crow at the Huffington Post
Would coherent sentences be too much to ask for?
ETA: Also - the SRIOTD thread is cranking out multiple spectacular examples by elected officials and national media personalities every week. And you’re posting about something Sheryl Crow said over ten years ago. I think that says all you need to know about how much “both sides do it”.
Oooh… you sure showed dem libruls, next maybe you can try and resurrect that “57 states” mistake Obama made 10+ years ago.
Glancing back through his curiously sporadic posting history, I suspect that the blame for this lies mainly on the limitations of our nascent language translation algorithms.