As usual, your reading comprehension is a bit shaky. The guys I work with who are very much like you are so because of their complete inability to sort fact from right-wing fiction. Perhaps you don’t get all your news from Fox, Limbaugh, or World Nut Daily. If so, then as near as I can tell, you get your information from sources with even less credibility.
Which you could have looked up on your own dumbass*
*Obligatory insult included as a lesson in pit etiquette for Tall Poppy
You can’t hire candidates based on their race, age, religious beliefs, and so forth. You are free to ask candidates if they can hire, retain, promote and evaluate candidates without regard to their underlings’ race, age, religious beliefs, etc.
For example…
Interviewer: Mr. Jobcandidate, do you feel that same-sex relationships are a perversion?
Candidate: Yes, I do.
Interviewer: Could you treat homosexual employees fairly if you were in a position of authority over them?
This exchange is perfectly okay.
Bigot is not a protected class.
It can be if you dress it in religious garb.
Pinky-swearing they believe in magic makes some believe they should get a pass. Very strange.
Just change “I hate gays” to “God tells us He hates gays” and you’re good to go. It’s even more convincing if you tell yourself that first.
We had a guy at work who had aspirations of being a proselytute. We told him “Not on the floor” (where we did our jobs). Breakroom, yeah, you can rant all you want in there, but keep it off the floor.
You really have to wonder that? Jay Sekulow, the guy who’s now Trump’s lawyer, founded the ACLJ, the evil twin of the ACLU. Jordan, mentioned in that article because he’s executive director of the ACLJ, is Jay’s son.
American Civil Liberties J’s?
American Civil LiveJournal?
I saw what you did there. It fell flat on its face.
American Center for Law & Justice. I’m actually surprised that they didn’t pick something even closer to ACLU, like American Center for Law & Virtue or something.
Which means it is hardly lonely amongst the 241 posts of yours that are lying face-down in this thread.
My laptop died, and I’ve been using my phone for all internet activities. Trying to research on it is a phenomenally frustrating experience. Thanks for the info.
Makes sense. I do think I’ll pass on making that thread though! haha
I can see the purposes, no doubt.
Yes, you are correct. I’m a hiring manager for surgical services, which includes these positions: RN’s for recovery room, operating room, and charge positions, surgical techs, and sterile processing techs. I also play a role in recruitment of new physicians.
I get what you are saying. I have been in group interviews to choose someone at that level, and we ask things like how they handle conflict objectively, and what style of leader are you? Another more tactful way to cover the racial topic could be, “how do you view diversity in the workplace”?
Not, “do you think gay sex is perverse???”
I still think that guy I was talking about last week, with my “old news” comment, was unprofessional to talk that way. If a conservative interviewed an openly gay man running for a high ranking government position, and said "what do you think about heterosexual sex? or “do you feel that Christian immigrants from the middle east should have equal opportunity to come to the U.S., or would you chose Muslims first?”, can you imagine the outcries and the news stories that would get?
Are you trying to ask serious questions, after passing on the idea to ask them in a forum with the greater chance to get serious answers?
Obvious you don’t care to be taken seriously, and are angling instead for the title of Disingenuous Dumbass #34, i.e. Yet Another Trump Voter.
That sounds like a field where hiring hard-line bigots would be a very bad idea.