Thus my point; you just justified my assumption that you’d have no idea why people would mock you for sentences like that. It had nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with your exposed lack of thinking skills.
I’m sorry if you’re just a pathetic troll pretending to be that slow. I’m equally sorry if indeed you are that slow.
The sentences I wrote were simple to comprehend. Not my fault you are too retarded to see the irony in complaining about state power while continuously advocating for more state power.
Of course it is. Every organization is an entity.
What’s charming about this attempt at a zinger is that it acknowledges that you are as nasty as one. Brave concession, old man. Courageous admission in the anus of defeat. Sturdy moral character. Could you stand just a little bit farther away?
They were inded simple to comprehend. And what we comprehended was that you appear to believe that some ludicrous strawman built by the Right actually represents the position of liberals.
In **octopus’s ** defense, strawman liberal is an idiot.
He is! As a group, we decided to get together and hate that guy. At least, I think that’s what the group decided. I was too busy getting an abortion and collecting welfare to go to the meeting.
Riiiight, like we actually would have told you the correct location. You’re a woman and we liberals all hate women.
Now, wait just a minute. If they’re Hispanic Atheist Science Teachers and disabled and gay (and kissing in a Protestant-White-CEOs-Only country club)… then they’re stickin’ it to The Man, and we think they rock.
But, as he pointed out, government is not an organization.
A government would be an organization. Without that indefinite (or a definite) article, the word “government” simply denotes a process for seeing to the needs of (usually large numbers of) people.
Mother of all that’s holy and bright you’re a complete and total moron. Ignored.
Doing it wrong.
*trying * to get it right.
Not necessarily succeeding, but trying.
Technically, maybe not a Republiopath idea, per se, but this guy is clearly a piece of work,
*Anti-government attorney Kory Langhofer argued over the weekend that the Supreme Court could continue to decide cases 5-4 in favor of conservatives after the death of Antonin Scalia because the deceased justice could effectively cast votes from the grave.
“There’s no Ouija board required to figure out how Justice Scalia would vote on these things, he’s already voted… We’re at the second-to-last step in how these cases unfold when Justice Scalia died. We know exactly what he thought… And it’s not unprincipled to say we should give affect to that.”*
Not so stupid after all; as long as we don’t have to continue paying Scalia. Heck, we could do that with all the Supremes as they die off. Save a bundle.
It will save even more if we don’t have to buy separate Ouija boards for each one, as long as their ghosts are willing to share.
I’m sure that Scalia had a Lee Atwater style deathbed conversion and all his future decisions would have been opposite. I think we can continue on and safely put him as the fifth liberal vote.
What kind of a commie suggestion is that? Sheesh. :dubious:
I think this whole bathroom thing is no big deal for young adults these days. My kids went to college and all three lived in mixed sex dorms with both sexes on the same floor. The youngest’s dorm had just one bathroom per floor shared by both (all three or four?) genders. It was kind of a brother-sister deal. No one made a big thing of it.
Seems more civilized to me than my college days. God we were troglodytes.