When you try too hard to get exactly what you want, you risk excluding more people from the coalition necessary to succeed. I’d love there to be a hyper-liberal, Green, pro-choice, internationalist, pro-science political party. I’d join! And so would about 56,000 other people. We wouldn’t have a chance in hell at the White House!
Why has God always sent messages in such oblique obscure formats anyway? If God wants to stick it to Obama, why doesn’t He just rain down fire and brimstone on Washington (or wherever Obama happens to be)?
Do you really want that? They’ve lost two presidential elections and the party is in the process of imploding. The only reason they’ve done so well in congress is that Republicans care far more about the party than about democracy or the country, and so will go to extreme lengths to gerrymander to get safe districts, exclude voters if possible, and obstruct. I don’t think progressives are capable of such things, thank Og.
If Sanders wins by some chance and little or none of his initiatives get passed, what is that going to do to the movement? It made the Tea Party more radical. Is that the kind of thing you want?
Much as I’d love to see these things happen, in reality him winning would set the Progressive movement back decades, and they are valuable in pulling the Democrats a bit more to the left.
The Tea Party has never elected a president either. Just taking over a party isn’t enough. You have to change the conversation.
The Occupy Movement, though they fizzled out, did help in making us think of the 1%. Republicans even have to pretend to talk about income inequality now.