I’d be surprised if there were 50.
And wouldn’t they have to be relatively close, geographically speaking? If he speaks to them weekly? So, one little cul-de-sac of African-American evangelical preachers is supposed to impress us and sway an election?
Well, a DDoS will do that. I hope the person they’re buying hosting from will pass the bandwidth overage down to them, and I’m glad they bought from my company’s competitor.
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer now claims her calling Hillary Clinton a “lying killer” was just a slip of the tongue.
I have a disorder where I often type words that are vaguely similar phonetically. A few days ago I wrote “pretends” when “protects” was intended.
Could the Honorable Ms. Brewer have a similar disorder that affects speech? She did correct herself immediately, right?
True, her Pavlovized synapses were set up for the associations Hillary –> Lying; Clinton –> Killer, but that just means she’s a fine upstanding Republiopath, upholding the only precept today’s GOP knows.
Stop me if you’ve heard this one:
I meant to tell my wife “Good night dear, I love you very much” but what came out was “You miserable bitch, you ruined my life!”
It’s a perfectly normal problem and I’ve done the same thing as Man Sewer.
Oops - did I say “Man Sewer”? I meant “Jan Brewer”. See? Happens all the time.
A Freudian slip is when you mean one thing but say your mother.
Is he talking about the fifty or so preachers who had been invited to Trump Tower to have a dialog about race with Trump, only to learn that it was being billed as 100+ Black Evangelicals were coming endorse Trump?
As I recall, only one showed up after that.
So when an interviewer is asked what polls Turmp is behind in and responds “all of them” that is seen as a good response, but when Palin is asked what magazines she reads and responds “all of them” she is castigated as light weight. That just shows the bias of the Librul media.
Palin doesn’t read “all” magazines. No one does. She meant “none of them.”
All the polls show Trump losing.
Where is the bias?
This is where a good journalist says, “100, huh? Well, that certainly is interesting and potentially important information, definitely worth follow up interviews with some of these people. Please provide me with their names and contact information. Name just five, along with their church affiliations, right now; we can deal with the rest later.”
IOW, call that bluff.
“Librul” shows you’re a mental lightweight. Your complaint does too.
Or, you know, it could show that he’s making a joke.
Do all of them show him losing though?
We can’t find ONE biased, stilted, dishonest poll that shows him winning? I find that sad.
I really hope he just whooshed you. Because the alternative (that he was serious) is just sad.
?sdrawkcab taht t’nsI
Well, there is that Fox News app that polled its users and found that 80% of them who supported Trump planned to vote for him.
Does that count?
Be careful when looking into the eyes of Poe’s Law.
Here’s a stupid Republican idea (or a stupid idea from a supporter of the Republican candidate for president): stabbing an interracial couple for kissing.