Stupid Republican idea of the day

After the Trumpcare debacle, someone should have some bumper stickers made up:

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
Well, at least they’re incompetent.

snerk

Hear about the half black/half Japanese guy? Every year on December 7th he attacks Pearl Bailey.

“their”

At least were incompetant!

Get some brains, morans.

Morans?

What is a moran?

One of this guy’s family.

:confused:

exactly

Sicks munce ago Trump coodnt even spel president and and now corts site themb!

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1536&bih=754&q=get+a+brain+morans&oq=get+a+br&gs_l=img.1.0.0l10.1895.3675.0.6964.8.8.0.0.0.0.106.669.7j1.8.0....0...1ac.1.64.img..0.8.661.IsqurSr2NHE

alternatively

No, that’s pretty much the same thing.

Found the bumper sticker.

Too fucking funny ElvisL1ves :smiley:

Lindsey Graham, who is what passes for an adult in the Senate Republican caucus, thinks elections matter - if Republicans win them, that is.

Where in the Constitution does it say how close to a future election you can be and still have an elected President get his nominees considered, Lindsey? *Somebody *here doesn’t understand America, but I don’t think it’s us.

Does anybody actually understand America? Which one? Hell, I don’t even understand Texas, and that’s only a chunk of it. Thought maybe I understood Minnesota, but then they elected Jesse Ventura to be governor, and that went right out the window.

Senate Republicans were totally within their rights to withhold their consent from Garland and prevent him from having a hearing. They realized that such an important nomination could fundamentally shift the direction of the court for decades to come, and that voters should have a say. People saying that McConnell and his fellow Senate Republicans abdicated their constitutional duty don’t know that the Republicans they had no duty to do so.

You know John Roberts, the current conservative Chief Justice of the Supreme Court? In 1992, when Roberts was a Bush administration lawyer, George H.W. Bush nominated him for a seat on the Appeals Court. Then-Senator Joe Biden, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, declined to give Mr. Roberts a hearing, in the hopes that Bill Clinton would be elected, and would be able to appoint liberal judges to the appeals courts. As we know, Clinton was elected, and his gambit paid off: Roberts’s nomination expired, and he returned to private law practice.

Biden had every right to block his nomination, but not to act outraged when the GOP did the same to Garland, considering his blatant hypocrisy

Voters *did *have a say. What do you think the most recent presidential election did?

Then they don’t now, either. There will be another election in less than four years. Maybe we should wait to see what the voters say then, hmm? Why or why not? Where does the Constitution, which Graham incidentally swore to uphold, say is the cutoff point?

Being in the Pit does not relieve you of the responsibility to [URL=“PolitiFact | In Context: The 'Biden Rule' on Supreme Court nominations in an election year”]get your facts straight](http://www.nytimes.com/1992/09/01/us/waiting-for-clinton-democrats-hold-up-court-confirmations.html). :rolleyes: