If the rifle is sighted in accurately, the worst that could happen with that shot is to break the bride’s left humerus. A painful injury to be sure, but hardly deadly unless the shot also nicks the brachial and/or inferior ulnar collateral arteries.
Dexter?
Now at least one Repub wants to make singing the National Anthem badly a crime.
Glad to see they have the important things covered.
Unbelievable. :rolleyes:
I truly wish it was. Alas, that is not the case.
On the other hand, had we had this legislation earlier Rosanne Barr would be in jail for life. So there’s that to recommend it.
Fuck, at least it’s only in Indiana. I thought this was something federal they thought up to avoid dealing with jobs and the economy – which is probably the same reason Indiana is considering it.
Not a stupid idea per se but I thought you guys would enjoy this:
It’s the Guardian, so you just know they worded it exactly like that on purpose.
…
oh, and ewwwwwwww.
Does this mean they’re going to retroactively prosecute Leslie Nielson for his singing of the national anthem in the Naked Gun?
Retroactively, and posthumously.
There;s a much better one –Santorum surges from behind in Iowa.
This is what gets me about “States’ Rights”. The closer you move to the local level the more insane things become. That is true both of conservative areas and of places like San Francisco that seriously considered banning circumcision.
Thank goodness we have the Bill of Rights and a broad interpretation of it.
Oh they got ‘behind’ in there too:
That was the sub-headline, and it’s a headline in The Guardian, one of Britain’s major newspapers.
(I can almost hear editors all over the world cackling with glee)
My favourite so far is “The Santorum Snowball Effect”. Somewhere out there a whole slew of headline writers are giggling a lot and really hoping the old guys in charge never find out about Urban Dictionary.
“The bill calls for schools to maintain audio recordings of all performances for two years and develop a procedure for dealing with complaints if a musician is alleged to have strayed from the approved lyrical or melodic guidelines.” What the hell is wrong with these people? I mean seriously. This is just a disgrace.
And this is supposed to be the party of “smaller government”? Bullshit. They’re for the biggest goddamn daddy nanny government outside of North Korea. Absolutely infuckingcredible.
Sadly, she’d have actually only been fined a whole $25 (ouch, don’t make it hurt so bad, repubs! :rolleyes: ). On the other hand, the cost to the schools to maintain the fucking audio recordings and field and handle complaints could be significant. But what the fuck do they care, so long as they get to dictate everybody else’s lives.
Well, her right arm is probably also resting on the groom’s shoulders, and the alignment is pretty straight, so depending on the degree of deflection off her left humerus, she might take a hit in her right humerus as well. Potential bilateral above-elbow amputation… yikes. How will she cook her husband’s meals then, as God intended?
Because clearly, what the Land of the Free should be able to pride itself on is its censorship. These fucking guys…
That headline is so hilarious to me I was skeptical it was real, but it’s from The American Spectator.
I’m holding out for the editor who manages to get “Santorum proves to be slippery customer in Iowa/New Hampshire/state of your choice” published.
“Santorum Emerges From Frothy Mix of Iowa Caucuses”