Just now I saw this thread juxtaposed with a forum thread titled “Judge forces 16-year old Moroccan girl to marry her rapist”.
It’s interesting how much the GOP now has in common with the enemy it’s so eager to condemn.
Just now I saw this thread juxtaposed with a forum thread titled “Judge forces 16-year old Moroccan girl to marry her rapist”.
It’s interesting how much the GOP now has in common with the enemy it’s so eager to condemn.
That’s not fair: Barack Obama never, to the best of my knowledge, forced anyone to marry their rapist!
(Is there any other enemy the current Republicans give a rat’s ass about?)
Common sense and logic?
Those words have no place in this thread.
But Both Sides Do It ™
Sure they do… they’re like curse words to Republicans.
No, the right response in the playbook is “But you believe in moral relativism, right? You tolerate foreign cultures, but not the oppressed Christians at home. This means you support Moroccan rapist-marrying, you secret muslim Christian hater!”
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 - they really believe in traditional marriage. In fact, they think that consensual sex is so heinous that God would prescribe death for those that engage in it (22:17 from the same book). Well, in that case if the man no longer consents to the marriage, the women is killed. If the women doesn’t consent then marriage is a suitable punishment. If both consent, both get killed.
Actually, that reminds me, Romney supports a traditional definition of marriage and he’s a Mormon. Clearly not “one man and one woman” then, eh?
Though I have to say, he’s probably the best Republican candidate for the American people. Ignoring every aspect of his personality and public appearance and going by policy alone, he commends moderate healthcare reform (though I’d support more comprehensive reform) and rights for gay couples (though I’d support marriage as well). I can’t say the same, at least on a federal level, for the other three remaining candidates.
Yes, in the sense that whooping cough is a “better” disease than AIDS.
Those moderate positions were as of 12:41 pm, yes? What are his positions now, an hour later?
Due to quantum uncertainty, the more precisely you know the timing of a Romney policy position, the less you know about the actual position.
Schrodinger’s Candidate.
Another point for Tennessee!
TN lawmaker says green policies are part of secret U.N. plot.
Suck it Arizona! We’ll be laughing when your puny contraception laws are overturned by a UN one-world government conspiracy!
Gotta love secret UN plots that are online at the UN’s website.
Also gotta love wannabe evil overlords that can’t be bothered to follow the fucking rules.
CMC fnord!
Next: forbidding paying in cash for anything the churchies are against - birth control, alcohol, cigarettes, lap dances, lotto tickets, public transportation, etc., cause you know, “In God We Trust” is printed right there on the dollar.
Bullets and guns, of course, will be OK.
And, thank God, altar boys are free.
And there’s some further blather about a War on Pornography. Nothing like a righteous war to get the blood pumpin’.
So what’s more stupid, Santorum’s thinking that he can stop Internet porn, or that it should be a priority of a POTUS to try? You gotta love the dig that Obama “seems to favor pornographers over children and families” (won’t sombody PLEASE think of the children!?!?!) False dichotomy much?
REPUBLICANS: PLEASE, please, please, for the good of Jesus and America’s Future as a Great Nation, nominate this [del]clown[/del] guy. The GOP is sure to prevail with such visionary leadership.
Nitpick: that’s more accurately Heisenberg’s Candidate Principle
And a BRILLIANT statement thereof, if a non-physicist may presume to start a slow clap.
Request permission to steal.
I always thought men were a contributing factor to prostitution and sex trafficking.
Nope. It’s all Eve’s fault.