I’m about 95% certain you’re joking, but just in case:
He wasn’t about to say “Nigerian.” The vowel is different and, anyway, that word makes little sense in the context.
I’m also about 95% certain that “ni” as spoken was short for “nigger” (or “nigra” or “Negro”). The question is whether this was an accidental blunder by Santorum, or deliberate:
To send a message to his base, while preserving deniability if the left-wing media goes after him for it.
Waitaminit! He used anit-war as a slur? Nigger, although vile, is understandable as black people are pretty worthless in this country as is demonstrated by teens getting shot for buying Skittles and iced tea. But anti-war? So Santorum is the pro-war candidate?
Clearly Santorum feels that Obama gets too bogged down in the minutiae of legislation and was saying that he’s an “anti-war government niggler” and we should vote that niggler out of the White House. Who could possibly be offended by that?
(Link to thread noting the gargantuan balls it took to respond to a video of him saying “I don’t want to make **black people’s **lives better by giving them somebody else’s money; I want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money.” With no other/alternate explanation than “*I looked at that, and I didn’t say that. *” Twice Mr. Santorum? Fool me once, shame on me … fool me … won’t get fooled again.
Probably, but given what Rhythmdvl linked to, he’s 2 for 2 on stumbling over words that sound really really bad given the context.
I mean, maybe it was an innocuous, nonsensical slip and his tongue was getting tangled; mine certainly does from time to time. We can even discount the fact that he should theoretically be a pretty good public speaker; we’re all human, after all.
But to be talking about people on welfare and trip over a word that sounds an awful lot like “black,” then to be talking about Obama in a negative manner and start a word that starts with what sounds an awful lot like “nig,” I dunno. Maybe he’s just supremely unlucky. Anyone got a clip of Obama talking about those hon- fine gentlemen vying for the Republican candidacy? (He was going to say honorable, not honkies, he really was.)
Perhaps he was going to say “niggardly no-good pacifist”?
Oh and the question is whether it was a Freudian slip (revealing the inner machinations of what he’s been aching to say): it’s highly unlikely that he’d calculate somehing like that as helping his campaign.
I didn’t say mispronounced. I said stumbling over words. I think, in the few times I’ve been able to stomach listening to Santorum, that he’s someone who stumbles over his words quite often. If I didn’t hate him so much, I’d feel some tiny bit of sympathy, as I tend to have the same problem. As it is, I didn’t hear “black” in the previous incident (I heard something like plah), and I hear “nick” in this one.
And he stumbles more than most since he made speaking without a teleprompter one of his trademarks (an oblique Obama slam, since he’s referenced that Mitt and Newt should be able to speak about their positions without one also - but everyone knows that Obama is helpless without one :smack:).
See post #4946. IMO that was exactly what he was saying. I don’t even understand your question. The sentence is perfectly cromulent if you’re a racist. Other people might say anti-war government guy. Birthers might say anti-war government Kenyan
.
Perhaps he gets a bit overenthusiastic in front of all-white crowds.