Stupid Republican idea of the day

So this isn’t a SRIOTDay. Or week. Or month. Or year. Aw hell. This one apparently comes from 1988 but it was too funny not to share.

Former Rep. Stephen Freind of PA, who apparently has never learned how to properly spell his own last name, said that the odds that a woman who is raped will get pregnant are “one in millions and millions and millions.”

…oh hey! I’m so glad you asked!

It’s because that the traumatic experience of rape causes a woman to “secrete a certain secretion” that tends to kill sperm. Tends to. So if you do happen to get pregnant, you must be the unlucky one woman in a million million million (Quintillion for those playing along at home).

Unspoken : “Or maybe you weren’t all that traumatized, eh ? Eh ?”

Is he the Freind that the Pennsylvania license plates claim we have in that state? (If so, they can keep him.) It’s fortunate that the people of Pennsylvania agreed with us Democrats that where the Republicans saw a Freind, we saw a Specter! :slight_smile:

Remember when John McCain stood up to the cranks in his audience who asserted Obama was evil?

Mitt Romney lacks that kind of moral fortitude.

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/05/07/479577/romney-woman-treason/

Well, if raising taxes on the wealthy isn’t treason, it should be!

Says he didn’t acknowledge it. Well, I can understand that. He doesn’t want to endorse her views, but it’s easier to say nothing. McCain came off better in this situation, though.

Seriously. From an evolutionary standpoint, why the heck would something like that exist? Your body is optimized for getting pregnant and passing on your genes (if everything is working correctly); your uterus seriously doesn’t care if you were emotionally traumatized during the procreational event.
I see that idea was from '88, I wonder if he’s been corrected in the ensuing 24 years.

Sexual dimorphism can favour making successful procreation more difficult. See duck’s vaginas for instance. It increases the cost of procreation for the male, making only the dedicated capable of performing such an arduous task, which may be a good predictor of fidelity (thus increasing the rates of survival of offspring).

Doesn’t change the fact that it’s a bizarre notion unsupported by any evidence (as far as I’m aware) in the case of humans.

Edit: Side note, found this about Americans for Prosperity and voter suppression.

Not really stupid, more depressing.

I’d rather not.

Prevert.

For God’s sake don’t google that phrase.
Rule 34

More importantly, do NOT google the phrase “duck penis”.

Unless you’re a major size queen…

Oh, or “echidna penis”. You were warned.

I think pretty much googling any animal penis, you’re going to come up with a horror show.

A very good rule to follow, but no…ducks and echidnas are a special kind of inadequacy-complex-inducing category of their very own.

On the other hand (so to speak…), if a silver back gorilla in a trench coat flashes you, you might respond “Oh, I had no idea gorillas were Japanese.” He probably won’t understand, but I’m not gonna risk it. Nope.

Weirdly enough, just yesterday I was googling for the female echidna’s reproductive system because a friend of mine on Facebook had described the male’s and I wanted to figure out how they fit together. I therefore saw pictures of the male echidna’s tackle. It was weird.

And I’m still trying to figure out how they fit together.

See? This is why I never go on the internet. I don’t have time for high-end research like this.

And just to stay on topic, more Republican tone-deafness:

Maine Gov says “Get off the couch and get a job!”.

“Gov. Paul LePage began his speech Sunday at the Maine Republican Party convention by saying he was glad he wasn’t campaigning.
He then proceeded to give a cheering audience 25 minutes worth of remarks that sounded a lot like a campaign speech, mostly on welfare”.

Not as of 1995. From my home state: [

](http://www.holysmoke.org/fem/fem0520.htm)

The best part of that quote is the nicely turned phrase “who are truly raped”.

It’s like he read about the “no true Scotsman” fallacy somewhere, and thought “hey, that’s a good idea! I’ll use that one!”