Now, I’m no expert on political strategy you understand, but I’m thinking: it’s not all that great a pitch, if you want to become the one tasked with applying the laws, to claim from the get go that you’re planning on unlawfully shooting people acting within the bounds of the law in your jurisdiction (because *you *know the law’s just wrong, gawd demmit).
Maybe it’s different in New Hampshire, I dunno.
And regarding one of the guy’s quotes in that article: no, fuckhead, there *is *no difference between legal and lawful. They’re synonyms, fuckhead. What you meant to say, fuckhead, was that there’s a difference between legal and moral. Which is true.
But it’s not up to the fuckhead sheriff to make that kind of distinction or decision.
Yes, Rush…it is all a massive scam. I heartily encourage you to prove it by going and camping out in your backyard next week. I’m sure you’ll be fine, since that hurricane is really Democratic propaganda.
Well obviously, but I’m still trying to wrap my noodle around the cognitive dissonance involved and the sort of morality pretzel you have to turn yourself into in order for that concept to even remotely make sense from a rational standpoint - which even bigots writing laws surely have to consider, right ? Don’t spoil my innocence, you monsters.
“By age X, we deem the average woman is mature and experienced enough to decide whether or not they want to suck a cock, and decisions involving the sucking of said cock are deemed to not involve power play or preying on innocence in any significant way.
Muff diving, however ? Now that’s different. You have to be extra mature for that choice the be meaningful and considered well-reasoned !”
Yay, the gold standard. At what point does the number of shared beliefs between the US far right and the Islamic Fundamentalist far right start to discomfit one or both parties?
Well, apparently that would make it a not-legitimate rape and the wife a shameless hussy. Because clearly if a pregnancy results, it’s not a real rape since she didn’t shut that down.
And now I feel dirty for delving into that mind-set.
In fairness, the parties use their platform committees as convenient places to send their radical ideologues and other hotheads. It makes them feel valued, and, more important, gets them the fuck out of the way for the people doing the *real *business. So, as a result you get some pretty weird documents that nobody else actually reads except when looking to score cheap points. Or to find out just how far out people can be and still be accepted as part of the party mainstream.