So I have to choose between the “. . . but you blow one goat!” reputation and . . . and . . . Here, Billy, Billy, Billy! Let’s be baaaaad!
Let’s be fair - in context, what she was referring to was a joke about how the media and “liberals” treated these cases - as if Edmund Perry didn’t choose to mug the cop but was rather forced into it. Doesn’t make her less of a stupid cunt, though.
Just shoot me.
I’m thinking! I’m thinking!
My condolences to everyone who’s old enough to get the reference.
“And my head hurts!”

OK, I got a gun, and you got ten seconds to decide: suck off a goat, or boink Ann Coulter. Nine, eight, seven…
Can the boinking involve Donkey Punches?

Let’s be fair - in context, what she was referring to was a joke about how the media and “liberals” treated these cases - as if Edmund Perry didn’t choose to mug the cop but was rather forced into it. Doesn’t make her less of a stupid cunt, though.
So because one young black man mugs a cop Zimmerman is justified in stalking and scaring another young black man until he turns around and attacks him, and then shooting him?

I’m thinking! I’m thinking!
My condolences to everyone who’s old enough to get the reference.
Benny Goodman? Mmm, no. Benny Hill? The guy with the violin? Wait, the other guy with the violin! I should know this one, I remember the old folks talking about him.

OK, I got a gun, and you got ten seconds to decide: suck off a goat, or boink Ann Coulter. Nine, eight, seven…
I wouldn’t do her with Ann Coulter’s dick.

Let’s be fair - in context, what she was referring to was a joke about how the media and “liberals” treated these cases - as if Edmund Perry didn’t choose to mug the cop but was rather forced into it. Doesn’t make her less of a stupid cunt, though.
Also to be fair, she made a good point about how the liberal media unfairly stresses that the victims are unarmed.
Because, as we have recently learned, no black man is unarmed when there is a sidewalk nearby.

Let’s be fair - in context, what she was referring to was a joke about how the media and “liberals” treated these cases - as if Edmund Perry didn’t choose to mug the cop but was rather forced into it. Doesn’t make her less of a stupid cunt, though.
No, context has nothing to do with it. Her statement was in its own paragraph to stand out and was totally inclusive of all blacks. She did not limit it to one or two individuals:
Perhaps, someday, blacks will win the right to be treated like volitional human beings. But not yet.
It was not an off-the-cuff remark she could be excused for because she’s 90 and senile, like Helen Thomas was, nor does she have Paula Deen’s excuse of being a dumb cracker. This is a reasonably intelligent person who is very media savvy. She worked on the exact wording to clearly state that blacks are not to be treated like humans. Any other interpretation is a naive and hopeful reworking of the facts because many liberals find it hard to accept that some people are just evil.
Well, somebody else, I might have taken it as “aspirational”, a goal the speaker dearly wishes to see. I think she’s crafty enough to word it that way so she can recoil in shock and horror at how she is assumed to be a racist. You do know, right, that its liberals who are the real racists! True fact, you could look it up.
John Boehner defines the mission of Congress:
“We should not be judged on how many new laws we create,” the nation’s top elected Republican said on CBS. “We ought to be judged on how many laws we repeal.”

OK, I got a gun, and you got ten seconds to decide: suck off a goat, or boink Ann Coulter. Nine, eight, seven…
If it involves a ballgag that won’t come out afterwards, I propose we draw straws to see who takes one for the team.

If it involves a ballgag that won’t come out afterwards, I propose we draw straws to see who takes one for the team.
Include a brown paper bag to put over her head and we have a deal.
Oh, why stop with the ballgag and the paper bag over her head for boinking Ann Coulter? Tie her down and put a sparkler in her butt, already.
Stop it, people. Just…stop. I’m begging you.

John Boehner defines the mission of Congress:
“We should not be judged on how many new laws we create,” the nation’s top elected Republican said on CBS. “We ought to be judged on how many laws we repeal.”
And how many laws have they repealed, exactly?
Oh wait, I found one: Congress Repeals Financial Disclosure Requirements For Senior U.S. Officials
The provision was part of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act (Stock), which became law in March of 2012. The act was intended to stop members of congress from profiting from nonpublic information…The Sunlight Foundation, which advocates for a more open government, called today’s repeal an “epic failure.”
The ick factor pretty much applies to both parties here, but there you go: Congress may now be judged.