But…but…but…wouldn’t that mean letting the, you know, black people have guns? :eek:
Well, maybe one of them DemoncRAT would have a problem with that, but a good Reagan Republican would . . . oh, nevermind.
CMC fnord!
[Moderating]
That’s a violation of the Pit’s language rules. Please avoid it in the future.
No warning issued.
[/Moderating]
The Constitution was wrote by and for white people. We let black people vote, the rest is, ehh, maybe.
The prudent should not be involved in either one, but retaliating against a lawless gang of armed men for murder of a friend is unarguably of higher morals than destroying the property of an innocent person.
Black people are subject to oppression from police across the country due to forced disarmament by progressive neo-eugenecists with racial tics in their brains. They don’t even realize they have laid waste to a once proud culture through their societal engineering schemes. The best you can come up with is “Reagan did it!”.
Kill Whitey.
I’m not sure if that post’s a perfect exemplar for this thread or if it crosses the line from “so stupid it sounds crazy” into “so crazy it doesn’t fit as a ‘stupid’” idea.
(A third possibility is that you’re not a Republican with a stupid idea, but just a random ‘I’m an Independent!’ anti-progressive nutjob with a stupid idea…)
A matryoshka doll of stupid/crazy and crazy/stupid, and I fear what’s in the center!
CMC fnord!
BTW I don’t think Reagan was a progressive neo-eugenecist with societal engineering schemes, but it was the 60s and the 80s . . . everyone was a little crazy!
Ah, anybody got a bottle of walnut oil I can borrow?
There’s a thread in GD (“Is Fox News really all that bad?”) that I’ve never clicked on. The answer is too obvious; it would raise my blood pressure to hear from anyone who doesn’t know the answer. I get more than enough Fox News just from this thread.
Now, now. FoxNews did connect the dots between Ray Rice and Saddam Obama but you slander them to suggest it had anything to do with politics. They specifically denied that:
[QUOTE=Andrea Tantaros, Fox News host]
My question is, not to bring it back to politics, but this is a White House that seems to bring up a ‘war on women’ every other week. A White House that is very concerned about the NFL, concussions, et cetera, prescription drugs in locker rooms. I want to know: where is the president on this one?
[/QUOTE]
What connection are Fox viewers supposed to derive? I’m guessing you’d find the answer if you look at photos of these two aggressive males side-by-side. Zoom in and study skin tone.
Poe? Is that you there?
Grover Norquist tried to claim that the Hippie-laden ‘Burning Man’ festival is a perfect example of no-tax, take responsibility no-government GOP ideals. Others explain why he couldn’t be more wrong.
No tax ? Don’t they sell tickets to Burning Man ?
Tickets are for squares, man.
Seems to me a great many are, in fact, armed.
Where do eugenics come into it?
Gee willikers, think of all the upheaval we would have been able to avoid if people like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown had been armed. Darned disarmamenters.
A Missouri lawmaker wants to opt out of the birth control coverage in his health plan.
Citing the could-never-have-imagined-this Hobby Lobby decision, Wieland argues that he should not be forced to pay for things that violate his conscience.
Man, when we can all opt out of paying for things we find immoral, that’s gonna be awesome. I can stop paying my state to execute people! Woo-hoo! I’m not sure how the mechanics of it will work, but I am totally opting out of paying for the debt we incurred while invading Iraq. Most of that will be paid for by my kids, of course, so I need to start teaching them now that they need to make sure they don’t retroactively pay for such a terrible sin as invading a country for no good reason. Anyway, I’m drawing up my list now. This is great!
ETA: Oh, wait. I’m an atheist. So I can’t claim religious objections. I guess I’m out of luck. Damn!
Science H. Logic, that sux!
I am not an atheist, I am a religious person who doesn’t believe in God. But by my lights, freedom of religion includes the right to be free from religion.