Ha! I knew what that was before I even opened it. 
Maybe I’ll start this as a thread in GD, but would the Smith Act stand up at all as constitutional? And would we really want it to?
Demonstrating, among other things, that his ignorance includes not knowing the difference between “electronic” and “electrical”.
How do you know? I have seen fans that have remotes, you cannot do that without electronics. For all we know, Crist had them put Siri inside there with fancy voice-to-blades compensatory modulation so that he could hear her clearly but nobody else could. Those Democrats are wily, you know, even if they used to be Republicans.
Hmm. Either. No, both. If we’re doing decadence, we gotta do it right.
Or, we could just throw Warwick Davis into the ring with Brendan Gleeson and call it a night.
This is actually more vile than stupid.
“How attractive is Marilinda Garcia?’’ Vaillancourt asked rhetorically. “You know how opposition ad makers usually go out of their way to find a photo of the opponent not looking his or her best. Well … Democrats and Annie Kuster supporters can’t seem to find a photo of Marilinda Garcia looking bad at all.”
Kuster, on the other hand, he said, is the opposite.
“Let’s be honest. Does anyone not believe that Congressman Annie Kuster is as ugly as sin?” Vaillancourt asked. “And I hope I haven’t offended sin.”
Psst! Post #17372, second link.
This story is so great and it’s even getting better. The party line explaining Scott’s behaviour:
[QUOTE=Rick Scott]
I waited to see, until we figured figure out whether he was going to show up
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Marco Rubio]
it wasn’t clear [Crist] was even going to show up.
[/QUOTE]
The excuse they’ve decided to go with is they weren’t sure the guy on stage in front of the cameras waiting for Scott was going to show up.
:o Sorry. It is a large thread.
I can’t decide whether WWF works better as World Wildlife Foundation or World Wrestling Federation in this context.
Perhaps there is finally a way for them to get along.
Let’s see, if we put the wrestlers in a big cage with the wildlife . . .
If you can’t be bother to spend a couple of your precious days skimming through 17 and a half thousand posts before responding, perhaps you should go elsewhere.
Yeah, you slacker!
More from the Fox News Medical A-Team.
Three guesses what the “A” stands for.
I take issue with the article writer describing Siegel as “a bad pundit”. Siegel is a good pundit if he says things that are attention-grabbing and memorable. A bad pundit would be bland, reasonable and forgettable.
Siegel’s a terrible human being, but not a bad pundit.
A good pundit also needs to carry at least a veneer of credibility. A schizophrenic vagabond ranting about CIA orbital mind control lasers is attention-grabbing and memorable, but not much of a pundit.
That’s what the CIA wants you to think …
the only way to be sure.
Put him in a suit and Fox’ll hire him.