So he believes the old saying about when someone shows you who they are, believe them.
Act like a petulant whiny baby, get treated like one.
At one point she was their leading contender for the Presidential nomination. Cover of TIME and everything.
It’s true, you could look it up.
From the article:
[QUOTE=Sarah Palin]
They’re shining that boot that liberals have on the neck of our economy. They’re carrying Barack Obama’s water even more so than Nancy Pelosi if you can believe it.
[/QUOTE]
Of all the metaphors she could have picked for people who cooperate with a black President, she chose that one.
Koch-affiliated American Energy Alliance compares EPA regulations to CIA’s use of torture.
There’s also a cartoon. No, really.
Here is a video from the Yale Climate Forum to show how, besides the billions saved in health costs, that the ones claiming that taking care of pollution does cause the number of jobs to decrease is telling a big lie. (The Climate Crocks guy was doing such a good job that he was contacted by Yale to work making videos for them)
Conservative groups completely ignore about how the EPA regulations, and climate agreements allow in reality for more jobs to remain and to be created while the regulations are enforced.“[since the 1970’s] our economy is 4 times bigger now than it was in real dollars then [since we applied environmental protections]”.
"Anybody who tells you that “environmental protection will affect the economy” is saying nonsense, it’s absolutely false. In fact in my work [what I see] in India and China and Mongolia and these other places that are heavily polluted seeking to develop in a western development strategy without environmental regulations [are finding that the loss of resources due to pollution are a growing disaster]…
You go there and you will never complain about the EPA again."
- Keith Schneider - environmental policy expert.
Missouri Republican introduces bill banning abortion without the written, notarized consent of the father. The only exceptions are for life endangerment and “legitimate rape.”
The thing is, those jobs are not in the OIL INDUSTRY, where those conservative groups get their money from.
So they don’t particularly care. When they post worries about “the economy”, they are actually only worried about oil company profits.
GAAAHHH! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
That kind of CRAP makes me wonder how soothing my soul would find it to learn of a bill being reported out of committee that requires Republicans to apply for permission to carry a pregnancy to term.
Probably not that much, to be honest.
What makes me crazy is the whole “prove you were raped” thing.
How the F&*? do you PROVE – like a rapist is going to come forward and say, “Yup, that baby’s mine!”
Even though I know many women are assaulted by men they already know, including date rape.
[
Serious adults are in charge here and we intend to make progress. … We’re going to change the Senate’s behavior, and hopefully change the country in the process.
](http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CONGRESS_MCCONNELL?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-12-17-14-11-05)
The stupid part is saying it out loud for the record, when all available evidence in a few years will show that this assertion is unsupported.

What makes me crazy is the whole “prove you were raped” thing.
How the F&*? do you PROVE – like a rapist is going to come forward and say, “Yup, that baby’s mine!”.
It’s kinda like how you have to include a police report when filing an insurance claim, as documentation that the loss actually occurred.
Because in jurisdictions where abortion was only allowed in cases of rape or incest, I’m sure clinics were flooded with women who’d just gotten pregnant on an oops-forgot-the-condom moment, and were all “yep, I was raped. And incested. You betcha.” It was a big problem, but now this closes the loophole.
[sarcasm], in case it’s not obvious.
And if women are expected to name names, false rape accusations will go through the roof, and even if women can just say “it was rape” the rape statistics will go through the roof, which just fuels even more misandry.
Are they wanting it proved in a court of law? If so, that’s a nicely-written way to make all abortions illegal – it’s not like that kind of case breezes through the court system like greased goose shit.

Are they wanting it proved in a court of law? If so, that’s a nicely-written way to make all abortions illegal – it’s not like that kind of case breezes through the court system like greased goose shit.
I’m sure they will let you get an abortion after a 9 month waiting period.

The thing is, those jobs are not in the OIL INDUSTRY, where those conservative groups get their money from.
So they don’t particularly care. When they post worries about “the economy”, they are actually only worried about oil company profits.
or more importantly profits to the oil industry. A rule of thumb that I use when reading conservative talking points. Replace all instances of the word “jobs” with “profits”, and replace all instances of “small business” with “my rich cronies”.
So that the statement, “Increasing the minimum wage will hurt small businesses and kill jobs” becomes “Increasing the minimum wage will hurt my rich cronies and kill profits”
The talking points make a lot more sense this way.

I’m sure they will let you get an abortion after a 9 month waiting period.
Somebody on my Twitter feed said “Somebody needs to tell this guy [Rick Brattin] women voters have ways to shut that whole thing down.”

or more importantly profits to the oil industry. A rule of thumb that I use when reading conservative talking points. Replace all instances of the word “jobs” with “profits”, and replace all instances of “small business” with “my rich cronies”.
So that the statement, “Increasing the minimum wage will hurt small businesses and kill jobs” becomes “Increasing the minimum wage will hurt my rich cronies and kill profits”
The talking points make a lot more sense this way.
This is great. I’m borrowing it from you.