Around Minnesota, the Vikings are claiming that the only people who claim that playoff experience doesn’t matter are teams without any.
I know that Atlanta didn’t have recent playoff experience lasyt year, and I suspect the same is true of the Chargers a few years back when they made it to the Superbowl.
Anyone know of other example?
P.S. I predict, hope, and pray that the Vikings lose!
%#@& Brad Johnson interception and fumble...can't believe the offense only got THREE %#@& points. And even then, if they’d just not turned the ball over, the defense would have won it for them.
And what was that stupid call on second down at the 33 on that last drive?? Run, or throw another swing pass to Hicks, but that stupid pass play where Brad almost got sacked out of field goal range??
The Redskins had it won, and blew it. %#@$&.
Falcon - glad your fantasy team is doing well…personally, football players don’t have a prominent place in my fantasies, but maybe that’s a gender thing!
I beg to differ, Jab1. I thought the Colts-Titans was a classic gridiron battle, even though the Colts lost (sob, sob). I find battles like that game much more interesting than most high-scoring games. That kickers’ duel of a first half was great.
After all, when the score is 49-37, who the hell is playing defense?
I don’t understand the Jacksonville score either. However, I have a sneaking suspicion that Huard (is that how you spell his name?) will be at the helm next year. I think the Dolphins are 5-1 with Huard and 5-7 with Danny Boy. Marino was one of the great ones, but I think he is over the hill, now.
And to all you Titans fans. Peyton and the boys will continue to improve, and the Colts will tame Tennessee in the near future.
St. Louis played defense while it still made a difference in the game. They outscored the Vikings 35-0 in a 22 minute span while allowing NO first downs. Minnesoat made it look like a “shoot-out” in the end, but it was a big a can of whup ass as a 12 point loss is likely to be.
Personally, I preferred the Titans-Colts game, too. The Vikes-Rams game was a blowout, not a shootout, after the early moments of the third quarter. That the Vikes scored a few TDs after the outcome was decided made it look closer than it was.
But Colts and Titans…if the Colts could have recovered that onside kick, who knows what would have happened. But Manning’s legerdemain in engineering that one scoring drive to make it 19-16 with 1:50 left, despite having no time-outs, was truly impressive.
More impressive, though, was the Titans’ shutting the Colts’ offense down.
Now that it’s down to four teams, who do people like? I’m going with the Titans; they’ve beat J-ville twice.
You know how it keeps on being said that it’s so difficult, when one team has beaten another twice during the season, to make it 3-0? Finally saw some numbers on this, courtesy of this morning’s Washington Post.
Here’s how the team with the 2-0 edge has fared when trying to make it 3-0, with the home/road breakdown for the teams that were 2-0 going in:
Overall: 13-9
Home: 13-5
Road: 0-4
Since the Titans are on the road against the Jags, the numbers are against them. But I’m sticking with my story: the Titans are going to go 3-0 on the Jags.
In the other game, I like the Rams. The Redskins were a decent but not great team this year, and it took a lot of luck for the Bucs to beat ‘em at home. I don’t see the Bucs’ having a prayer (they wouldn’t be able to hear themselves say it, anyway) in the Rams’ noisy dome.
Um, Bricker? How can St. Louis beat Tennessee when you have them losing to Jacksonville today?
And in a random mini-rant…I HATE WATCHING FOOTBALL WHEN MY ROOMMATE IS HOME! Yes, I know playing out the last 16 seconds is boring. But as the Tennessee/Buffalo game proved, a lot can happen in a few seconds. I’m sorry…it just takes a lot of the fun out of the game when you’re watching it with someone who keeps complaining. grumble Just needed to share this.