Not sure how kosher it is for someone who hasn’t been here for a year to take to task someone who’s been here just a wee bit longer.
This is the first thread I’ve come across with him in it… http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=815845
…and hopefully my last. Sure not interested in checking out his posting history. (I can’t see much chance for deviation in non-thinking behaviour if I wasted my time in doing so.)
koufax - I’ll give you an out, here.*…
I’ll cut you major slack, and lay off the pitchforks, if you indeed acknowledge NOT that
…but that - you WERE wrong.
full. end. stop…Like, on just about every single point you made it that thread.
Feel free to point out which ones you felt you weren’t completely misguided bonkers on.
And make it snappy - gotta crash soon and those damn partying kids across the street better not leave a fucking mess on their lawn!
Again!!!:mad:
But really though? Am I gonna have to go through your posting history to further buttress my view?
*fuck I’m the most gentlemanly sonofabitch this goddamn pit has ever seen.
ok seriously - I’m not going to cut and paste what is without question the vast majority of his brain-shy comments that I’m sure you’ll also concur is whack. And I’m sure you saw them all addressed sufficiently, so, I’m now looking for what was stated in the OP.
Not to mention the number of posts he didn’t address. For that I’ll address tomorrow, as I much regret posting this when I’m about to keel over go sleepykins kinda thing.
So koufax - I expect to see a reasoned response tomorrow morns.
You don’t know for a fact that he isn’t Sandy Koufax. If Curt Schilling can have nutty political opinions, why would be harder to believe about any other Hall-of-Fame-talent pitcher?
If I were Jewish, so devout that I wouldn’t play a World Series game on Yom Kippur, I damned well wouldn’t want anything to do with Trump’s alt-right parentheses brigade led by Steve Bannon. :smack:
Since every point he made was dead on target, why should he say they were wrong? Are you trying to deny that Meryl Streep publicly applauded a child rapist? That alone should show that she is absolutely clueless. Her childish little tantrum at the award ceremony is just further proof of it.
No, you’re just mad because she properly identified your new owner as worthless. You’d be totally fine with her if she was also torture-supporting scum.
:dubious: Trump supporters might want to be careful about how they condemn expressions of approval for perpetrators of sexual assault, including assaults on children. Glass houses and all that.
In any case, just because Meryl Streep in 2002 applauded the award of the Best Director Oscar to Roman Polanski for The Pianist does not imply that she in any way approves of his having committed statutory rape in 1977. Nor does it make any of the things she said about Donald Trump in her Golden Globes speech untrue.
Gotta agree with Clothahump - what did koufax say that was wrong? Streep applauds someone who drugged and anally raped a thirteen year old girl, but spends her whole speech condemning Trump for making fun of a reporter. That seems like a legitimate point to me.
If she applauded Polanski (praised or just clapped? both deserve criticism, but clapping is a marginal sin, IMO) then that deserves criticism, but it doesn’t take away any valid points she made about Trump.
As opposed to the Childish Little Tantrum Trump just gave at his very first news conference? She is all class… where Trump is just… (…hmmm… ok, what rhymes with ‘Class’? Gas…? Ass…? Tass…?)
It certainly does take away from her point - it shows she has the moral judgment of an oven mitt. Making fun of a reporter is all dreadful and wrong because it normalizes bullying. Butt fucking a child gets a standing ovation.
No, you’re mixing up applause for acknowledgement of a filmmaking achievement in 2002 with applause for perpetrating statutory rape in 1977.
Meryl Streep (and thousands of other people) did the former. Nobody, AFAIK, has done the latter.
Even for conservatives, it really shouldn’t be so difficult to see the distinction between these two very different things.
And, as I pointed out earlier, it’s rather remarkable to suddenly see Trump supporters taking the crime of sexual assault seriously. :dubious:
Because Trump supporters, in a desperate “look over there!” move, decided that since they couldn’t refute Streep’s actual 2017 comments about Trump, they would try to distract people by complaining about Streep’s 2002 applause for the Best Director Academy Award for a renowned film made by a filmmaker who committed statutory rape in 1977.
As I noted, while it’s refreshing to see Trump supporters suddenly talking about sexual assault as though it ought to be taken seriously, Polanski’s 1977 conviction for statutory rape still isn’t significantly relevant to Streep’s remarks about Trump forty years later.
I was wondering this myself. I think it started on some alt-right blogs, and the Usual Gang of Idiots decided to drag it into the SD.
While I couldn’t call myself a fan of drugged child anal-rape, I do recognize Polanski as an artist of stature who has made many films I’ve thoroughly enjoyed. If I was in the room when he got an award, I’d clap too. I also adore the music (and libretti) of Richard Wagner, though I don’t condone wife-stealing, massive egotism, or being an anti-Semitic goofus.
Oh cool, I had not realized, before this post sent me to Google, that Sandy Koufax was still alive. Good for him, and yeah, let’s hope his lowercase namesake currently infesting these boards is just an unrelated tool.
Good for him, and yeah, let’s hope his lowercase namesake currently infesting these boards is just an unrelated tool.