The Big Bang Theory, Season 10, Episode 7 (November 3, 2016) -- "The Veracity Elasticity"

Amy offered to teach her Op but they were speaking Ubbi Dubbi on this episode. They even name dropped it.

The ages of Amy and Penny only have a little to do with it. I taught my kids Ubbi Dubbi when they were little (although I doubt they’d remember it now. Taught 'em the finger thing too).

Uh, apparently the sponsors found the Sex Dungeon scene a bit too spicy and had to tone it down. That is, cover up Penny’s top.

Link: http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/watch-big-bang-theory-scene-9200321

I don’t see anything in that article that says that they “toned it down” and “covered up her top”… just that some advertisers reportedly “banned” it (in the UK I guess?) but that’s exactly how it showed when I watched it.

Looks like what they aired to me. Maybe some markets cut it, like in East Texas.

For what it’s worth, the characters are sometimes meant to be younger than the real ages of the actors. The real ages (and my guesses at the supposed ages) are as follows:

J. G. (Leonard) is 41, but the character is probably meant to be about 35.
J. P. (Sheldon) is 43, but the character is probably meant to be about 35.
K. C. (Penny) is 30, and the character is probably meant to be about that age.
S. H. (Howard) is 35, and the character is probably meant to be about that age.
K. N. (Raj) is 35, and the character is probably meant to be about that age.
M. R. (Bernadette) is 36, and the character is probably meant to be about 32.
M. B. (Amy) is 40, but the character is probably meant to be about 35.
K. S. (Stuart) is 45, but the character is probably meant to be about 40.

The dominatrix outfit made up for it.

Agreed, best episode in a long while. No really big ha-ha’s but quite many little chuckles.

One thing I think helped is that they focused on just two couples. Raj, Howard and Bernadette were quite secondary but playing into that. E.g., Raj stating that the fight didn’t involve him and he was going to eat.

In addition, there wasn’t really two separate storylines for Amy/Sheldon, Penny/Leonard. It was basically all one storyline. The couples were going thru parallel issues.

Trying to squeeze in 3 or 4 unrelated storylines into one episode is a bad idea. This episode shows the right way to do things.

You know, now that I think about it a bit, Feynman is a curious hero for Sheldon. Feynman was quite social, very devoted to his first wife during her illness, played with salsa bands in Rio, took up art in his later years. He was something of an experimentalist, demonstrating how the Challenger accident happened by dipping a piece of o-ring in ice water. And he was, from what I’ve read, an exceptionally gifted teacher. Sheldon has shown little interest in being social, and is downright contemptuous of experimentalists and teaching.

Robot Arm writes:

> . . . Feynman was quite social, very devoted to his first wife during her illness . . .

It’s not clear if he cheated on his first wife. He certainly did on his second and third wives. He was “quite social” in the sense that he didn’t remotely care about being faithful to a wife or girlfriend. And in that he was different than Sheldon also, since he had enormous amounts of sex and Sheldon has only had sex once. And while Feynman was social in the sense that he liked to talk with other people, some people who knew him well considered him kind of a jerk. Which means that he was like Sheldon.

Regarding Sheldon and vans. There is no consistency in his knowledge about the possible creepiness of vans.

Previously in “The Benefactor Factor” S4E15, Sheldon comments: “Just because the nice man is offering you candy, doesn’t mean you should jump into his windowless van.” But in “The Hook-up Reverberation” S8E04, Sheldon is unaware of the problem with driving around picking up children and giving them candy to take them to their comic book store.

What Sheldon knows or does not about these matters varies from episode to episode.

Is it fair to call him “something of an experimentalist” because of one thing he did during the Challenger investigation? From looking at his wiki, he was best known for his work in quantum mechanics & electrodynamics and partical physics.

Also, he’s in total worship of Professor Proton.

I wasn’t aware of the cheating. I do remember stories of him traveling from Los Alamos to visit his wife and sending her letters cut into pieces because she liked to do puzzles.

Not just because of the ice water. In one of his books he describes the chained calculations (done by teams of people) needed during the Manhattan Project, and how (with the right method) they could backtrack and correct errors. And there was his interest in lock picking and safe cracking. He strikes me as someone who was very capable with hands-on type of things, not just theoretical.

Right, such things have t be agreed upon.

Yes, you’re right. It certainly did!

Caption underneath one of the photos

Penny and Sheldon?

Well, this is interesting. A spin off is in the works.

Not sure about this one. Sheldon’s oddities work best in an ensemble. But we’ll get to meet his brother and alcoholic father.

I just remembered something else about this episode. Sheldon asks Amy to sing him to sleep with 2001: A Space Odyssey. Surely Sheldon would have called it Thus Spake Zarathustra, or Also sprach Zarathustra, or even “Sunrise” from Also sprach Zarathustra, or most likely he would have explained all of those titles and which ones were wrong.

Existing thread.

I was thinking the same thing while watching that episode.

Old Sheldon would. New Model Sheldon wouldn’t. Much.