On a slightly more serious note, why not just some random asshole who wanted to kill people and cause mayhem for the hell of it? Motivation the same as the Columbine killers. Seems as plausible as anything else.
Which is why we shouldn’t be calling it “terrorism” yet. Yes, it fits the mold really well, but there’s still no motive. I thought it was smart when the president initially avoided the word, but now everyone’s fully aboard the terrorism train, with all the associations that entails.
It’s been mentioned several times that it could either be some lone nutter or some kids trying a new tactic instead of the standard gun rampage. Certainly it’s plausible.
And yet, there is a certain logic behind some folks thinking that Saddam had something to do with 9/11 back in 2003 (it was wrong, but there is a logic there), while there is zero logic behind going from domestic right wing extremists to Islamic terrorist. But you keep flogging that dead horse if you like.
Possibly – but bombing, well, it’s more of a Unabomber/causehead thing, it is not the usual MO for apolitical spree-killers/serial-killers. They prefer to do it up close and personal. (There are some exceptions.)
The whole reaction to the event has been full of this, from all sorts of people. It is sickening. People are so fucked up and narcissistic that they are more worried about saving the public image of the group that they identify with, or confirming their hatred, than anything else.
In view of the violent history of the American right, the belligerent rhetoric from the Palins, Angles, Limbaughs, Coulters, the NRA, the calls from the right-wing blogosphere for violence & mayhem and Krystallnacht-type activities, misinformation and rabble-rousing from right-wing politicians, the constant apologetics from even more “moderate” right-wing spokesmen it’s hardly surprising that people would naturally suspect this is the work of a home-grown fascist.
Are some of us hoping that will turn out to be the case? Well, in a word, yes. In the aftermath of the Oklahoma city bombing, you may remember, public opinion - even from those who had been marginally sympathetic - turned so firmly against the fringe right-wing groups that they were forced underground for several years. If there could ever be a silver lining behind the horrific events in Boston, this would qualify.
SS
There has never been any doubt in my mind that the USA will continue to be hit with terrorist attacks. So far we’ve been either very good or very lucky not to have sustained a worse event. It’s just too damned easy.
Naturally I’m hoping the perp turns out to be a home grown nutjob (whether Islamist, right wing or other) Somehow that seems less ominous than an organized group from outside the country.
The one certain result will be a further ruination of the 4th amendment. It had already been pretty much shot to hell, and will be shredded even more now.
NPR is saying that the pressure cookers contained blasting caps, nails, and, instead of ball bearings, BBs. My mom had a pressure cooker but by the time I was eleven she had broken the valve and didn’t use it anymore. I think the evidence pointing to sixth-graders is growing.
I pity the people at Fox who, when jumping to conclusions, ALWAYS point at the Muslims. They lack imagination.
I knew they should have banned Slingshots, Air Rifles and Cherry Bombs: A Child’s Guide to Low-Intensity Conflict Weapons and Tactics! The School Board wouldn’t even answer my letters! :mad:
Meanwhile, shades of fucking 2001 with this ricin letter thing. As we all feared with the anthrax letters back then, this could be “the other shoe dropping”, or it could just be a horrible coincidence and two separate people or groups of people (as was ultimately the case with the anthrax letters).
Anyone know anything about Roger Wicker? Is he, I dunno, a leading proponent of unrestricted drone warfare, or keeping Gitmo open, or anything like that? Conversely–he’s a Mississippi Republican, I presume pretty conservative–has he recently announced a willingness to compromise on guns; or taxes; or immigration; or some other hot-button issue? Or alternatively, is there some reason why a left-wing nutbar might choose him as the Face of Right-Wing Evil to whom to mail a ricin-laced letter?
I mean, no offense to the junior Senator from Mississippi, but…why him?