The Bundys are at it again.

Are the business, the cattle, etc. in her name? If so bill her for the grazing fees and, if she doesn’t pay, attach her assets.

Is there some reason they can’t do that?

Can he make as much this way as opposed to selling to the packers? It seems like he’d have to butcher and sell a LOT of meat on his own. Can he make enough to keep his head above water?

So, he is probably running his ranch in an even crappier way profit wise than actually just paying pennies per acre (and well under fair market value) for grazing rights.

So, he is tanking his ranch through stupidity and probably blaming the government for it.

I’m not sure that that relates to terrorism but the fact that there’s such a strong religious component to their “movement” is troubling. It’s hard to reason with people who think that they’re on a mission from God and that God has explicitly promised them something that they believe is being taken from them.

I thought commercial slaughterhouses were regulated, and under inspection by the USDA. Is this another little “freedom” Cliven receives? The freedom to sell possibly contaminated meat? (I’m thinking *E. coli *from intestinal contents, which I think I recall is pretty common even in inspected facilities. Not suggesting the Bundys traffic in industrial waste. Although that is possible too, in Libertopia. Freedom!)

That actually made me feel sorry for him; I suspect he has some unresolved mental health issues. He’s about the age where schizophrenia generally manifests, right?

Or, in this case, “Marshal, Marshal, Marshal.”

There are some ways around USDA regulations that are commonly employed here in Oregon. If you raise livestock, you can sell any animal “on the hoof” to a buyer, then have the animal slaughtered (or slaughter it yourself) and give the processed meat to the buyer of the live animal. This approach is commonly used by small producers who may raise a few cattle or pigs for their personal freezers and have animals left over to sell.

If the meat is processed by a mobile butcher – and there are a good number of those in Oregon – then the packaged meat is labeled “Not inspected, not for sale.”

I doubt Oregon is the only state where this approach is used, so if the Bundys do something similar on their Nevada ranch it may be legal to a point. However, if they’re using this method as a means of sidestepping USDA regulations to make a living, then I expect the USDA would be very interested in pursuing violations.

David Fry is reminding me of Adam Lanza.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas…

It doesn’t seem like anyone is interested in pursuing violations.

Considering it took 15 years of litigation and an armed standoff to not collect any grazing rights fees I can only imagine what it would cost the USDA to inspect Bundy’s slaughtering facilities.

Thanks for the detailed explanation! I had no idea. As for this expectation, no, I’m with RNATB on that score.

OK. Since know one yet had mentioned libertarianism, I was not sure where that was going.

eschereal, did not mean to be snarky.

The judge has arrived in Burns, convened a grand jury and issued its findings.

The text you quote is not at the link in your post (the link is from 12 January 2016). Where did you find it?

Well, it’s on a cached-version of a page of those unstoppable purveyors of TRUTH: Before It’s News.

Wonder if that phone number is legit… hehehe… :smiley:

Looks like it comes from this Facebook post.

Here come da Judge! Here come da Judge! Here come da Judge!

(Of course, Flip Wilson was always easier to take seriously.)

[Moderating]
jasg, I have removed the phone number from your quote. Please be a little more careful about posting other people’s contact information.
[/Moderating]