The hidden price of free

And that last bit is exactly why I refuse to pay companies that deliberately add inconveniences in order to get me to pay for more convenience. By paying, I’m encouraging that practice.

With Free to Play games, it’s not even just “badgering you for money.” The whole idea is that they provide a somewhat enjoyable or satisfying experience (often using tricks there, too). Then they take it away. But then, if you pay just this small amount, you can get back to your fun. Now, isn’t it worth it?

I tend to avoid anything that makes me feel like wanting to do something I would usually not want to do. With ad supported video, I usually can find a way to view it without ads. That’s where the manipulation is: in the ads themselves, or in the inconvenience of them plus an offer to pay to get rid of them.

But with F2P, the manipulation is baked into the experience. They aren’t just bombarding you with ads, but making it harder not to want to pay.

If it can make me feel that way, then it can work on anyone.

The ads that make me laugh are the ones for windows. Buy one, get one free! What this means, of course, is that the little-kept secret is that windows are w-a-a-a-y overpriced to begin with, and even with a BOGO deal, you’re still paying way more than they’re worth. Either that, or the labor cost has been jacked up to compensate.

What pisses me off is how Netflix will pause the ad if you switch to another tab. I’ve been ready to cancel them since the last price hike anyway.