I don’t have a problem with the letter as written, or at least with the content of the letter.
We write with appreciation for your commitment to Ukraine’s legitimate struggle against Russia’s war of aggression. Your support for the self-defense of an independent, sovereign, and democratic state has been supported by Congress, including through various appropriations of military, economic and humanitarian aid in furtherance of this cause. Your administration’s policy was critical to enable the Ukrainian people, through their courageous fighting and heroic sacrifices, to deal a historic military defeat to Russia, forcing Russia to dramatically scale back the stated goals of the invasion.
I mean, that’s all good.
Given the catastrophic possibilities of nuclear escalation and miscalculation, which only increase the longer this war continues, we agree with your goal of avoiding direct military conflict as an overriding national-security priority.
I think that’s also true. If the US military entered Ukraine to fight off Russia, that would probably escalate things in a dangerous way.
We are under no illusions regarding the difficulties involved in engaging Russia given its outrageous and illegal invasion of Ukraine and its decision to make additional illegal annexations of Ukrainian territory. However, if there is a way to end the war while preserving a free and independent Ukraine, it is America’s responsibility to pursue every diplomatic avenue to support such a solution that is acceptable to the people of Ukraine. Such a framework would presumably include incentives to end hostilities, including some form of sanctions relief, and bring together the international community to establish security guarantees for a free and independent Ukraine that are acceptable for all parties, particularly Ukrainians. The alternative to diplomacy is protracted war, with both its attendant certainties and catastrophic and unknowable risks.
This all seems fine as well. What Russia has done is illegal and outrageous. Ukraine needs to remain free and independent, and Russia shouldn’t be given an inch of the country. Sanctions are in place as an incentive for Russia to stop these actions, and it would make sense to ease them if Russia cuts this shit out. The letter isn’t suggesting a compromise, such as giving Russia some of the land, or letting Russia put in a special ambassador to “guide” the country, or any other such bullshit that gives Russia any control of Ukraine.
I guess the problem I have is that the letter isn’t asking Biden to do anything that he’s not already trying to do. It’s like running up to firefighters who are putting out a blaze, and yelling at them that they need to put the fire out. No shit Sherlock. They already know that.
I also don’t like that the creation of this letter implies that Biden bears a responsibility for what Russia is doing and the suffering of Ukraine, and the ripple effects of the war such as scarcities and economic turmoil. As if Biden could put an end to this if he just cared enough to try. And it gives fuel to people criticizing Biden for things he has no control over; not just the war but gas prices, inflation, and so on.
Traitors? No. Tankies? No. (Plus they aren’t British.) But it’s politically stupid. Especially right before a midterm election. What the fuck are they thinking?!