I thought this was one of the better episodes this season, especially the B story. The Hillary Swank debate was this show at its best. I especially liked Oscar’s and Stanley’s speeches, Oscar’s carefuly prepared and analytical presentation followed by Stanley’s impassioned appeal to emotion.
Michale and Dwight’s dog and pony show at the rival paper company wasn’t bad either. It looks like they might be hinting at Michael being considered for a New York job.
“Hot is a temperature, people.”
I liked the Hillary Swank part of the episode too.
Michael’s story was ok, but I think they went too far in trying making the audience,(and Michael), feel sympathetic for the Mom-and-Pop paper shop owners. The extreme kindness of these people, and the cute little kid… they just laid it on too thick for my tastes. I wanted to feel Michael’s struggle at the end, but I didn’t have much sympathy because the owners seemed almost like caricatures of do-gooder’s.
I thought Michael was actually not a buffoon in this episode. He handled himself quite competently during his espionage mission, whereas Dwight was a nightmare. This may be the first episode where Michael did nothing to make me cringe, and was mostly a normal person. It was nice, for a change.
I was expecting that whole storefront to be some kind of staged fake-out or sting. If the family is really that naive and trusting then Dwight was right – if Dunder-Mifflin didn’t devour them, someone else would have.
Can’t say one way or the other, but I’m hoping they don’t drop this thread but have another ep or two that deals with this small company and the front office’s interest in Michael’s “skills”.
I just saw it again. I still think they laid it on too thick, with the “World’s Best Father/Son” mugs, and the little girl having her own name plate. You’re right though, about Michael’s bittersweet chocolate speech. He just gave up trying to deffend it. It wasn’t a bad episode.
In what I percieve as being “hot”, Hillary Swank is not.
“Hot” isn’t always ideal though. Pam for instance is “cute”, not “hot”, but I wound’t change her. In fact, I found her to be even more attractive when she looked a little more modest.
Ginger May have been the “hot” one, but Mary Ann was “cute”, and more attractive imo than Ginger. I think “cute” women tend to age better too.