Because I’m feeling petty.
Choice last.
There IS no god Nancy Grace is an eldritch abomination! I despise that smug, self-righteous <expletive deleted>!
I’ve gotta go lie down, thanks Skald, way to start the day on a miserable note.
Shouldn’t the avatar of Cthulhu be visually distinct from him, so as to lull us into a sense of false security?
That’s why she dyed her hair.
Because a human (if, in fact, she is not a Reptiloid ) like Grace exists, we have positive proof that the Creator is not only evil but thinks that evil is entertaining (for varying values of the word ‘entertaining’).
Remember, tragedy is something bad happening to you; comedy is something bad happening to someone else.
Gagundathar:
Because a human (if, in fact, she is not a Reptiloid ) like Grace exists, we have positive proof that the Creator is not only evil but thinks that evil is entertaining (for varying values of the word ‘entertaining’).
Remember, tragedy is something bad happening to you; comedy is something bad happening to someone else.
You had to go ahead and call her that, didn’t you?
Now you’re gonna get the Skrull Emperor on your ass. He does not tolerate such insults.
Is Option 3 meant to be God, not Good?
I chose the option with Natalie Portman, but if I had my druthers would substitute Keira Knightley: http://www.celebrity9.com/img/keira-knightley/keira-knightley.jpg
Keira Knightley is the lesser alternate to Natalie–the best of the scribbles from Eru’s artist pad before Portman was made.
Zoe
July 9, 2010, 12:32am
13
As an attorney, she never lost a case. She did go through a pretty rough time after her fiance was killed.
She was coached to present herself this way for television and like so many others before her, sshe too the bad advice. I was sorry to see her do that.
Zoe:
As an attorney, she never lost a case. She did go through a pretty rough time after her fiance was killed.
She was coached to present herself this way for television and like so many others before her, sshe too the bad advice. I was sorry to see her do that.
I’m sorry, Zoe. I will need you to post something that is venomous, petty, cruel, hateful, insulting, and venomous.
And yes, I know I wrote *venomous *twice. I like venom.
Stuffy
July 9, 2010, 2:49am
15
I’d like to participate but she’s on my list of crazy folk I wouldn’t mind doing.
Wow!
Until I saw this topic, I thought I was the only one who thought she was annoying.
Not that she shouldn’t have,
Prosecutorial misconduct
The Supreme Court of Georgia has twice commented on Grace’s conduct as a prosecutor. First, in a 1994 heroin drug trafficking case, Bell v. State , the Court declared a mistrial, saying that Grace had “exceeded the wide latitude of closing argument” by drawing comparisons to unrelated murder and rape cases.
In 1997, the court was more severe. Although its unanimous decision overturning the murder-arson conviction of businessman W. W. Carr in the death of his wife was caused primarily by other issues, the court made note of Grace’s court actions, citing “inappropriate and illegal conduct in the course of the trial.” * Her opening statement in the case promised the jury evidence of physical abuse that she had to know would never be admissible because that entire aspect of the case had already been excluded by the judge.
Other courts have criticized Grace’s conduct even while upholding convictions in her cases. In a 2005 opinion, a panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals said Grace “played fast and loose” with her ethical duties and failed to “fulfill her responsibilities” as a prosecutor in the 1990 triple murder trial of Herbert Connell Stephens. She failed to turn evidence over to his defense team that pointed to other suspects. The court noted that it was “difficult to conclude that Grace did not knowingly” elicit false testimony from a police investigator that there were no other suspects despite strong evidence to the contrary.[RIGHT]CITE [/RIGHT]The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in [COLOR=“DarkRed”]Stephens v Hall
Those are just the cases that we know she fucked someone over on, I’m sure some investigation would turn up more. :mad:
Which might explain, but not excuse, her embellishment of the facts of the murder and trial,
Allegations regarding fiancé’s murder
In March 2006 an article in the New York Observer suggested that in her book Objection! , Grace had embellished the story of her college fiancé’s 1979 murder and the ensuing trial to make it better support her image. Grace has described the tragedy as the impetus for her career as a prosecutor and victims’ rights advocate, and has often publicly referred to the incident. The Observer researched the murder and found several apparent contradictions between the events and Grace’s subsequent statements, including the following:* Her fiancé, Keith Griffin, was shot not at random by a stranger, but by a former coworker, Tommy McCoy.
McCoy did not have a prior criminal record and, rather than denying the crime, confessed the night of the murder.
The jury deliberated for a few hours, not days.
There was no ongoing string of appeals (McCoy’s family did not want any). McCoy has only once filed a habeas petition, which was rejected.Grace told the Observer she had not looked into the case in many years and “tried not to think about it”. She said she made her previous statements about the case “with the knowledge I had.”
In response to MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann’s claims in a March 2007 Rolling Stone interview where he was quoted as saying, “Anybody who would embellish the story of their own fiancé’s murder should spend that hour a day not on television but in a psychiatrist’s chair,” Grace stated, “I did not put myself through law school and fight for all those years for victims of crime to waste one minute of my time, my energy, and my education in a war of words with Keith Olbermann, whom I’ve never met nor had any disagreement. I feel we have X amount of time on Earth, and that when we give in to our detractors or spend needless time on silly fights, I think that’s abusing the chance we have to do something good.”[RIGHT]CITE [/RIGHT]The Observer article [COLOR=“DarkRed”]Did Nancy Grace, TV Crimebuster, Muddy Her Myth?
Bathing in the blood of your murdered fiancé to sell books and raise your standing in the victims’ rights movement (which has more than enough real victims who’s stories make Grace’s fictionalized one seem like a good day in court), after being a poster child for everything that’s wrong with what should be the good guys in the justice system by lying about things that are public record. Not just evil but stupid too! I’m not buying any excuse for lying about someone’s murder for personal gain. At least she’s honest about abusing the chance she has to do something good … five hours a week on CNN Headline News.
If I weren’t already sure there was no Devil, Nancy Grace would clinch it.
CMC fnord!
I prefer old fashioned mafia hit men and protection rackets to the kind of evil that is Nancy Grace and Sean Hannity on the airwaves. They are teachers of evil who teach evil for personal profit. I’ve done a lot of things in my life that I was ashamed of afterwards, but intentionally spewing misinformation for profit isn’t one of them.
Nancy Grace is the worst of all of them. She inspires me to think bad, bad, bad thoughts.
phouka
July 9, 2010, 6:59am
19
Could it be that God exists and loves us and has a really low sense of humor, getting some cheap giggles by foisting NG on us?
I find that philosophy explains a lot about life.
If Natalie Portman serves God, how do you explain “Phantom Menace”?
