carrps
February 1, 2019, 6:56pm
30245
eschereal the seriously twisted:
To continue the hijack, The President’s Analyst is not at all like a Flint movie. The Flint movies were camp Bond sendups, with their ultra-competent superspy hero. The President’s Analyst , by contrast, is deeply fucked up, in the manner of a Delicatessen or Big Lebowski : properly disorienting and weird, with a strong flavor of the late Sixties, which, if you did not live through that era, might not quite make sense to you.
Just another thumbs up for TPA. The above is a great description.
“It’s the Phone Company!”
carrps
February 1, 2019, 7:02pm
30246
Meant to add: Did Lily Tomlin’s Ernestine character come before or after TPA the movie?
“We’re the phone company. We don’t care. We don’t have to.”
septimus:
3½ years ago in Vanity Fair :
That April, Ivana began to tell her friends that she was worried about Donald’s state of mind. She had been completely humiliated by Donald through his public association with Marla Maples.
“How can you say you love us? You don’t love us! You don’t even love yourself. You just love your money ,” twelve-year-old Donald junior told his father, according to friends of Ivana’s.
“What kind of son have I created? ” Trump’s mother, Mary, is said to have asked Ivana.
Second non-quote paragraph of that article and I notice this (published 9/1990):
It was spring, four years ago. Donald and Ivana Trump were seated at opposite ends of their long Sheraton table in Mrs. Marjorie Merriweather Post’s former dining room. They were posed in imperial style, as if they were a king and queen. They were at the height of their ride, and it was plenty glorious. Trump was seen on the news shows offering his services to negotiate with the Russians. There was talk that he might make a run for president. Ivana had had so much publicity that she now offered interviewers a press kit of flattering clips. Anything seemed possible, the Trumps had grown to such stature in the golden city of New York.
[my bold]
So, Donald was eager to “negotiate” the Russians in 1986? What was he going to get out of it? That’s Soviet era even before Vlad.
JohnT
February 1, 2019, 7:08pm
30248
Obviously, the #FakeNews tentacles of the #DerpState go back a long time in their efforts to frame #DearLeader . WAKE UP, SHEEPLES!
garygnu
February 1, 2019, 7:12pm
30249
Here’s an article about that situation. It was even before the KGB brought him to Moscow in the fateful 1987 trip.
TPA was released in 1967; Lily Tomlin joined the cast of Laugh-In in 1969. That’s not probative, of course; her wikipedia page indicates that she entered the comedy field in 1965, but it’s more likely that TPC in TPA informed Ernestine’s attitude than the other way around.
Thanks. Interesting:
Because, Lown [Dr. Bernard Lown, associated with the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize] recalls Trump saying, “I’m going to call Ronnie and ask him to make me ambassador plenipotentiary to Moscow.” It took Lown a minute to realize that by Ronnie, Trump meant President Ronald Reagan.
Trump’s plan, Lown says today, was to personally negotiate a nuclear arms deal and – in the process – do nothing less than end the Cold War.
“It’ll take one hour of discussion before the Cold War is over,” Lown said Trump told him.
Lown told Trump that in his opinion, Gorbachev might be ready to make a deal and that he also found the Soviet leader intelligent and knowledgeable. It was not the same impression he formed of Trump.
“I thought he was inattentive and self-concentrated. I thought what he said was idiocy. He didn’t understand the complexity of the issues.”
…
Trump’s interest in nuclear negotiation goes back as least as far as 1984 when he told The Washington Post “it would take an hour-and-a-half to learn everything there is to learn about missiles. … I think I know most of it anyway.”
…
Trump’s plan to negotiate with Gorbachev wasn’t that much different from his negotiating style 30 years later.
Everything was about Trump’s personality, Lown said.
“He would so charm Gorbachev that he would have no option but to agree with him,” he said.
[my bold]
Wow, with Trump the more things change, the more they stay the same. The bolded part was the guy’s opinion of Trump back in 1986, when Trump supposedly still had his full mental faculties.
Trump must really want that Nobel Peace Prize…
Or, an Emmy…
Or, a building in Moscow.
And, apparently, Trump has known almost all there is about nuclear missiles since the '80s without even researching the subject.
“I go, ‘hey, why did you open the door for the horse?’ and they go ‘well, the hospital was inefficient!’”
:rolleyes:
Canceling a treaty that one side isn’t complying with isn’t going to get the other side to comply any more than letting a horse into a hospital is somehow going to make the hospital more efficient.
bobot
February 1, 2019, 7:57pm
30253
"…Because, Lown [Dr. Bernard Lown, associated with the 1985 Nobel Peace Prize] recalls Trump saying, “I’m going to call Ronnie and ask him to make me ambassador plenipotentiary…”
He recalls Trump saying “plenipotentiary”?
?
I don’t think so.
Good news, everybody: Skeptic on radiation limits will head EPA radiation panel !
Acting EPA head Andrew Wheeler on Thursday announced the appointment of Brant Ulsh, a health physicist, as one of the EPA’s science advisers and the panel chairman. Ulsh has been a leading critic of the EPA’s decades-old position that exposure to any amount of ionizing radiation is a cancer risk.
In a paper he co-wrote last year, Ulsh and a colleague argued that the position was based on outdated scientific information and forced the “unnecessary burdens of costly clean-ups” on facilities working with radiation.
Last year, Ulsh told The Associated Press that “we spend an enormous effort trying to minimize low doses” at nuclear power plants, for example.
“Instead, let’s spend the resources on minimizing the effect of a really big event,” he said.
U.S. agencies have long maintained there is no threshold of radiation exposure that is risk-free.
It occurred to me the other day that, if you put his name back into German, instead of “Donald John Trump”, you get, “Donald Johann Drumpf”.
6-6-6.
Wake up, evangelicals!
JohnT
February 1, 2019, 8:24pm
30257
Max_Torque:
It occurred to me the other day that, if you put his name back into German, instead of “Donald John Trump”, you get, “Donald Johann Drumpf”.
6-6-6.
Wake up, evangelicals!
I mean, tbh, how else do you expect Revelations to play out if nobody follows the Antichrist?
kaylasdad99:
TPA was released in 1967; Lily Tomlin joined the cast of Laugh-In in 1969. That’s not probative, of course; her wikipedia page indicates that she entered the comedy field in 1965, but it’s more likely that TPC in TPA informed Ernestine’s attitude than the other way around.
Nah, back then everybody hated TPC. It was a monopoly that could treat us like dirt while sending out PSAs exactly like this.
(listening to the incessant buzzing in that clip) Yes, living in Today’s complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But there they are!
Is this the correct order?
The Russians are Coming! The Russians are Coming!
The President’s Analyst
Dr. Strangelove, or How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the Bomb
jsc1953
February 1, 2019, 9:20pm
30261
Strangelove: 1964
Russians: 1966
Analyst: 1967
viakix
February 1, 2019, 9:21pm
30262
Just curious how President Trump would be viewed by the media if he ran as a democrat instead of republican?
Right, I know that, but I mean to sit and watch all three in a row. Strangelove has to come last, because, you know, only individuals of the highest quality.
Airbeck
February 1, 2019, 9:26pm
30264
You just joined today and this is your first post. Welcome.
The media would cover the things that he says and does just like now. “The Media” is not a single organization that all makes decision as one. So asking what “The Media” would do is as non-nonsensical as asking what the American public are going to have for dinner tonight.