Or else what? There’s no way he’ll call any election honest, having suffered “rigged” elections in the past. I know we’ve long thrown out the Constitution, yet is he going to set up a military Politburo? I reckon “Some republicans” will be okay with that.
There’s that word again “honestly”. And here he is saying “federal controls”, which itself isn’t in the Constitution. He’s not going to accept any results. If Thomas Jefferson meant for the president to “approve” of elections else enact martial law, Benjamin Franklin, Adams, Washington or any of those other morons, would have said “You are telling a King we just want our own King”.
trump has already “rigged” the November elections. Will any republican speak out against this government treachery?
I keep hoping the “Trump is dying” thread title is changed ASAP.
‘I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.’
~ Karoline ‘A girl can only make up so much bullshit on her own’ Leavitt
The key word in all of this is “says”. Trump SAYS he’ll “nationalize” the elections. Trump SAYS a lot of things. Many of them have no connection whatsoever to reality or what he or his admin are actually going to do. He SAID last May that he was banning mail-in voting. He then said it again in October and last week. He SAID he would not allow Zohran to become mayor of NYC. He wound up calling in love with him in the Oval Office. He SAID there would be $5000 DOGE checks and $2000 tariff checks. My bank account is still looking kinda slim.
Trump is now going with “Nobody knew that was in the video”.
“I looked at the beginning of it. It was fine,” he said, referring to the first part of the video that contained debunked claims about fraud in voting machines.
“It was a very strong post in terms of voter fraud,” he went on. “Nobody knew that that was in the end. If they would have looked, they would have seen it, and probably they would have had the sense to take it down.”
Now, now Donny. Don’t lie. Everyone that saw that knows that that was in the end. “take it down” do you mean platforms should censor people’s speech? Because even someone as challenged as you are must realize that the people that put it up, put it up with intent because they knew that that was in the end.
What? I served active duty Army, drilling Army Reserve, and active duty Navy and I never heard such a thing. And why three instead of four. Let’s go ahead and ruin every weekend not just 75% of them.
Seriously, when did this nonsense begin?
As it is, it’s certainly not having the supposedly ostensible effect. (From the same link.)
And in evident answer to my query just above:
Why does this remind of the joke about the farmer’s son returning home from college? “Fantastic, Dad; just fantastic!”
Oh, and just in case you thought (hahaha) there’s no grift here (and the bolding is mine).
It might be something specific to this one officer. Here’s the whistleblower’s email;
Our unit is a combat outfit. Our unit commander requires active participation from our unit members at what he determines to be official “Unit Activity Events” or UAEs which are supposed to create a bond within our combat unit and its families.
His UAE events have been everything from unit softball games, flag football contests, barbecues and picnics and “movie nights” for our unit members and their families. He has also held Bible studies and given these “UAE” status for those of us who attend.
Attendance at all of these UAEs is not mandatory but our unit Commander requires attendance at least at 3 of the 4 these each month. He is the person who decides what is a UAE and what is not. Failure to attend the minimum of 3 UAEs per month will be negatively reflected in our fitness eval reports.