(Smapti quoting Trump)
Someone needs to tell him that infinite ammo cheats only exist in video games.
Though he seems to have found a way to hack reality so maybe it’s not far off base…
You know, I honestly wonder whether Donald Trump has ever played a video game in his life.
I now present an actual court filing that an actual lawyer, who presumably went to law school and passed the bar, has filed on behalf of DOJ in a case where the government is facing a finding of contempt.
I immediately thought the same thing.
I have occasionally fucked up setting bookmarks in the table of contents of a Word document, but I’ve never just left it like that.
Yeah. I trust my assistant to do things correctly, but I look at everything she does before it is submitted. If that is what I saw, on screen and/or on paper, it would go back to be redone correctly before filing with the court.
On “The Simpsons,” they joke about Dr. Nick Riviera going to the “Hollywood Upstairs Academy of Medicine.” I’m starting to think that all the so-called lawyers in Trump’s administration went to the “Hollywood Upstairs Academy of Law,” just across the hall.
According to this story, Iran had accepted the US terms on nuclear weapons, and Trump and Israel launched the attack before that could come out. The real ghoal, it claims, was control of the oil.
Iran Had AGREED To US Demands And THAT’S Why They Were Attacked
“Khamenei and his religious leaders and the military leaders sat down to have a meeting to draft their reply accepting the U.S. demands. “ — Michael Hudson
Economist Michael Hudson appeared on “Democracy Now” Tuesday morning and revealed something I’ve not heard anywhere else; Iran had accepted the US demands before they were attacked. He explains how this went against the plans of the United States and Israel.
A War for Oil: Economist Michael Hudson on U.S. Quest to Control the World’s Oil Trade
We speak with economist Michael Hudson, who details how President Trump opted to attack Iran despite progress at indirect U.S.-Iran negotiations. “The whole reason that America has attacked Iran has nothing to do with its getting an atom bomb,” but instead the aim was U.S. control of oil, says Hudson. The Trump administration may have been after the ability to “turn off the power” to countries that don’t follow U.S. foreign policy, he says.
AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org. I’m Amy Goodman, with Juan González.
“The US/Israeli Attack Was to Prevent Peace Not Advance It.” That’s the headline of a new article in CounterPunch by the economist Michael Hudson, who details how President Trump opted to attack Iran despite progress made during last week’s U.S.-Iran negotiations in Geneva. In the piece, Hudson writes about the significance of these comments by Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi, who appeared on CBS’s Face the Nation Friday, one day before the U.S. attack.
BADR ALBUSAIDI: If the ultimate objective is to ensure forever that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, I think we have cracked that problem through these negotiations by agreeing a very important breakthrough that has never been achieved anytime before.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re joined now by the economist Michael Hudson, president of the Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends, distinguished research professor of economics at University of Missouri-Kansas City.
The yips is a golf term. You miss what should be an easy short putt and then you start doubting yourself which makes you tense up on your next short putt which causes you to miss that putt and so on. That feedback loop is the yips.
I doubt if Trump has ever had the yips. If he misses a putt, he just says he made it and everyone around him tells him it was the best putt they’ve ever seen and he moves on to the next hole. I’m sure it will be the same thing with respect to boots on the ground. He will say it was what he meant to do and everyone around him will tell him those are the best flag-draped coffins anyone has ever seen.
That’s because the meeting to select a successor went like this.
I nominate.,you!
No way! I won’t do it.
How about…yuou?
No, I have to..weed my yard. Too busy.
I know, lets get Khamenei.
Hes, uh, dead,
No his son!
Perfect!
Gee, if only someone had predicted that attacking the hard-line regime would bolster the power of that same hard-line regime.
Liberty University.
Good Lord.
They are literally advertising for the stupidest people.
And getting them!
“I’ve brought home more American Warfighters than any President in history! Mothers with tears in their eyes have come up and said, ‘Sir, thank you for bringing my son back to me.’”
Which, typical of trump, isn’t even true!
What I expect to happen very soon is he will be the first president to lose a navy ship in combat since WWII. He can brag that up, too.
… with tears in their eyes …
Mad King Donald says he gets to decree the winner of the Texas Senate primary.
The approval rating for bombing Iran is a mere 27%.
In 1973, 60% of Americans thought the war in Vietnam was a mistake; so that means 40% of Americans did not think it was a mistake.
The Epstein War with Iran is less popular than the Vietnam War.
And then 45 people a day were being killed in the war.
And 1973 was after a decade or more of American intervention in Vietnam.
We’re at 27% after less than a week. Any chance the Iran War gets more popular?