So are they going to indict EVERYBODY who reposted this particular picture, and/or EVERYBODY who posted anything with that particular number combination?
I don’t think it will make it to court - I think it will be laughed out by the grand jury (if it even makes it that far)
Too late. Indicted means a grand jury has already ruled. Too bad it didn’t go the same way as when the DoJ tried to indict the six senators who said military members do not have to obey lawful orders. IIRC not only was there no indictment, not a single grand jury member voted to do so, incredibly rare.
Ahh my bad…
I can’t believe a grand jury would indict on this. It’s clearly a bullshit charge, applied only to a single person for the purpose of intimidation. I mean it’s plainly obvious.
No argument there. “The Department of Justice” would be renamed “The Department of Revenge” if there was any justice.
Have you noticed only one group of people persist and even insist on highlighting President Obama’s middle name?
Isn’t the “crossing a state line to get busy” AOC fedeerally mandated at 18?
Unlawful orders. They said members of the military are prohibited from following unlawful orders. That’s the law, too.
The entire cabal at the top operates as dictators, so why not call it the Department of Just Do It?
The same reason we now have a Department of War.
We do not, in fact, have a department of War. It’s still the Department of Defense. Just because a day-drunk martinet likes the word “war” does not make it so. It takes an act of Congress to change the name and as we’ve all seen this Congress is incapable of acting.
That initialism made my brain slip off the rails this morning. More coffee good.
While the Department of Justice files briefs in support of their case against the National Trust for Historic Preservation that sound like they were cut and pasted from a Trump social media post (or as the New York Times article suggested, “written in President Trump’s recognizable online voice”), the Department of Justice is expected to defend against a lawsuit filed by Trump against the I.R.S. (asking for $10 billion) because his tax returns were leaked to the New York Times in 2019. As the Times reports, the judge in that case asks whether the Justice Department can be sufficiently independent. “Accordingly, it is unclear to this court whether the parties are sufficiently adverse to each other.”
As the judge explained in her order, the Constitution requires that the two parties in a lawsuit are genuinely opposed to each other — and not colluding to engineer a legal ruling favorable to both sides. Without a conflict, the lawsuit is void and the judge must dismiss it.
You know I dislike candace owens like a lot, but that is so over the top disgusting. He’s such a flatulent bag of racist, misogynist shit; I wish he would explode at his next junk drawer meeting, and rain all that gooey, stinky, pollution over all of them.
Jason Nesmith: What? What was that?
Alexander Dane: Uh, nothing.
Jason Nesmith: I heard some squealing or something.
Gwen DeMarco: Oh, no. Everything’s fine.
Teb: But the animal is inside out.
Jason Nesmith: I heard that! It turned inside out?
[the pig-lizard explodes]
Teb: And it exploded.
Jason Nesmith: Did I just hear that the animal turned inside out, and then it exploded? … Hello?
Gwen DeMarco: [Flipping a bit of pig-lizard off her communicator] Hold, please.
The Protects sex-offenders on the fake cover is especially rich.
It’s true. Back when I managed a fast food restaurant we had to 86 a guy who was drunk and obnoxious. The grill cook dragged him out back by the dumpster and executed him.
The felon loses in yet another court.
War Criminal Hegseth told he’s a child during congressional hearing. (The bolding is mine.)
As each day goes by, I find myself wanting more and more to see this toddler’s toddler’s officer evaluation reports during his “so-called” service.
What a romantic!
Best summarization of why one should not vote for the pubbies in November.
They are all Ballroom Republicans. That should be in headlines from now until the mid-terms.
Ballroom Republicans.
Ballroom.
Ball room.
Room for ball.
Room for balls.
Room for whose balls? (Rhetorical)
This is what it’s come down to. Just sign a non-nuclear deal and let’s be done with it. Wasn’t that what Iran asked for? But, of course, now it’s his idea. So much winning.
And he stole Joe Biden’s sunglasses.
Well, perhaps we could just go back to the 2015 deal. HOWEVER, Iran now holds more cards, so they will probably want more concessions than were given back then.
From Wikipedia, my bolding:
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action more commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, was an agreement to limit the Iranian nuclear program in return for sanctions relief and other provisions. The agreement was finalized in Vienna on 14 July 2015, between Iran and the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC)—China, France, Russia, the U.K., U.S.—plus Germany)
On 8 May 2018, the U.S. officially withdrew from the JCPOA after Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum ordering reinstatement of sanctions.
They looked so much cooler on Joe.
