The Trump Administration: The Clusterfuck Continues (Part 2)

Lil’ Marco, I have questions.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a U.S. diplomatic campaign to dismantle the International Criminal Court “brick by brick,” claiming the tribunal could be used to override U.S. courts and the Constitution.

  1. Why now? We (US) have been ignoring the court all this time.
  2. Is this “distraction” related to US war crimes committed recently and ongoing? (If you need examples; murder on the high seas, abduction and assassination of sovereign state leaders, coordinated bomb and missile attacks on foreign nations without a formal declaration of war, blocades of foreign countries based on whims and “gut” feelings, …).
  3. Does this relate to the incarceration and murder of foreign nationals within the US?
  4. How do you feel about invasion threats to Cuba, Canada, Greenland, Iceland​:face_with_raised_eyebrow:, Panama, Mexico … and how these threats impact your travel and that of other US “dignitaries”?
  5. How about those Epstein files?

Could be related to Netanyahu. He’s not exactly on good terms with the ICC at the moment.

Though I’m sure a foreign head of government surely couldn’t have that much sway over US policy /s

There is a bottom.

maybe

Felon’s TeleprompTer operator “on leave”

for placing insider bets on Felonious speeches, making him upwards of $100,000

Only the best people.

His real crime was not giving kickbacks to the boss

/s

No “/s” needed there: this IS an observed pattern with Donald. He’s okay with grifting, but ONLY if it is done with the requisite messaging 'we may be doing well by following in your Glorious Wake, Dear Leader, but we know we owe it all to you.’

He does love money. But in these cases it’s not so much that the criminal failed to hand him his envelope of cash—it’s the public perception that the c. put one over on him. It’s the image of ‘clueless loser’ that is infuriating him.

Considering that the US has burned through all its diplomatic credit, good luck with that.

Dementia Donny says he’s going to tariff Canada for not raking their forests.

He could just announce his own AI service soon and take a cut out of the billed “proceeds”.

And only making a hundred grand. What kind of weak-ass grifting is that?

I’m confused. I thought smoke was good; or is that only when it comes from burning coal and gasoline?

“Ten dollar words” is not meant to be taken literally. At least, it didn’t use to be.

They’ll get right on that, starting with Nunavut.

Dipstick doesn’t understand that he doesn’t charge Canada tariffs, he charges Americans for buying Canadian goods. And who in the fucking world rakes their forests?

Back in his first term he somehow convinced himself that Scandinavian countries don’t have wildfires because they “rake the forest”, because he can’t grasp that wildfires are part of the North American ecosystem which have been exacerbated by human activity and climate change.

https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/08/20/trump-blames-california-for-wildfires-tells-state-you-gotta-clean-your-floors-1311059

Maybe he thinks that forests are just big golf courses with lots of obstacles in the fairways.

Y’all remember the constitution? Rip van Simplefelon doesn’t.

I got a kick out of this bit.

Somebody back then must have been clairvoyant, realizing we would have an object lesson soon enough in such a threat.

“Only the Best People”, example number 99 and a half.

That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Feel free to read the rest for more of his appalling behavior.

What do dick doctors think of the war criminal’s focus on other men’s balls?

In short: he’s dicking it up. He’s stepping on his dick. He is a dick.

Guess who got helped my foreign election interference.

My bold.

“Divided”? You mean some doctors think this is a sensible idea??

I HATE these wimpy, weak-ass, equivocal reactions by actual medical doctors! They should be screaming, “THIS IDEA IS BATSHIT CRAZY!!

you forget that Mehmet Oz has an actual medical degree

I posted a few days ago about him thinking that not using medical insurance is fraud, somehow, something.

Why do I imagine those partiular doctors are the surviving ones from those whom the tobacco industry hired?

It’s probably more like 998 doctors said “This is a terrible idea” and two writing-their-own-prescriptions-Adderall-addicts said “What was the question again?” and since the response was not unanimous the “fair and balanced” article has to report that opinions are divided.

Sarcasm (sorta).