You’re right! In this case, “winning” means returning to the status quo before Trump fucked it all up. No matter how this shakes out, we’re going to lose because Iran is going to walk away with something and we’ll have less.
Good god, this woman is a terrible communicator. I think Trump might actually get rid of her. He can’t afford to have someone this bad trying to sell him right before the midterms.
They obviously believe that they are the be all and end all of not only military prowess but of every field of human endeavor. Anything whatsoever that contradicts that is something they will blame on Obama first, then Biden next. The life-long professionals who have dedicated their lives to the defense of the United States and ensuring their troops are trained and taken care of are, at best, props for the felon and his armchair lieutenant general. If those props have the temerity to even insinuate the felon and said looie general are doing anything wrong, the props will face the full force of the military justice system.
Also, I hand’t heard the republican party nominated him for president.
The stable genius general first set up the need for Iran to pursue nuclear ambitions. Then when he got back in office, he absolutely reinforced that need. And there’s absolutely nothing, no possible result in that war which will be a win for the SG. He guaranteed that the instant he ordered attacks while pretending to have diplomatic negotiations.
Exactly! As for less, we have less military personnel thanks to the felon getting American service members killed. Of course, he also got hundreds of children killed at a school. So, no doubt, in his twisteed mind, the US won that exchange
Aren’t a bunch of magaflatearthers convinced Arabic numerals are woke and an Islamic/Democrat/Communist attempt to take over the United States?
Nah, that’s not what would get him to can her. Her cribbing from his playbook, though, is a definite no go. And “I never said ‘at law’ when I called myself an attorney” isn’t the pull she thinks it is.
Nope. They were just standing outside in a field. What more do you need?
How about never again? I mean that’s always an option right? Just a quick reminder that during the first Trump regime they basically just stopped doing press briefings altogether for like the last year of his term
Speculation is running rampant that Trump has to dump her for various reasons. Knowing that he is physiologically incapable of admitting a mistake, it occurs to me that we may see a repeat of this. It doesn’t seem like there’s any requirement to actually hold a press briefing. It would be monumentally stupid to do so right before the midterms of course, (not that that would stop anyone associated with the clusterfuck), but if we do see the blue tsunami that everyone is talking about, there may not be any reason for Trump to continue doing these. Or to have somebody doing these at least. He doesn’t see himself as accountable to anyone or anything so there’s never going to be a need to ever answer a question again as far as he would be concerned.
My personal favorite being bandied about according to various sources on the Internet saying the felon’s team, not the felon himself, is that she cannot read. That’s the felon’s job: being illiterate.
Evidently the only requirement for the chief executive to say anything (other than the oath of office) is to communicate his assessment of the state of the union, “from time to time”. This is in Article II, Section 3, Clause 1 of the constitution. There’s no requirement for him to talk to the press.
Why should he see himself as accountable. He never has been, not to the point where he has actually suffered.