In this thread, one poster asks how bad the circus actually is for the animals involved. The answer? Circus animals are killed when the circus goes out of business.
Why? Oh because she guesses that’s what they do:
Based on the theory that if zoos are well run, they are at capacity, ergo excess animals are killed. She doesn’t work in a circus, mind you, but she just continues to convince everyone that everything they say actually serves to prove all of her theories! And then pretends through some mental acrobatics that you have actually been agreeing with her all along!
Concurrently, we have her valiant efforts to solve the debt crisis. See, the solution is just to stop spending.
No more, no less, just stop spending. See, because if bankruptcy is good enough to force everyday people to lower their spending, bankruptcy must be good enough to force the country to stop spending so much, equating it to the country to a petulant spendy wife “wanting to buy a new wardrobe every spring”. Just tell that foolhardy woman no!
She has about two whole pages of noteworthy quotes in the “Is Obama All That Different from other Presidents?” thread
My favorite, however, is her extensive crush on Casey Anthony. You remember Casey Anthony don’t you?The person everybody keeps following on the news because she is so charismatic.
Her obsession over all things Casey Anthony borders on psychotic, and the sheer number of personalized, creepy statements she makes about the case are simply astounding. Oh, she is also an expert in forensics and investigations of murder. And finding bodies in the woods:
Bolding mine.
Why is she so focused on the case? Well, it’s because she’s also creepily obsessed with other cases. As in all of them:
She also refers to Casey with statements that seem to imply that they know eachother, or at least that Susanann knows her better than anyone!
I could quote entire pages from that particular thread, because there are so many crazy entries. Feel free to share your crazy Susanann interactions.
Susanann, here’s a tip. Stop posting every insane thing that crosses into your tiny brain and then trying to trick everyone else into thinking they have actually been agreeing with you all along. Take some time off watching CourtTV and pretending you are a detective/judge/juror/forensic investigator and interact with actual people.
We know how much you hate Obama, and how you know the secret answer to all the big crimes on TV. Why, it’s so obvious, why can’t anybody see it besides you??
Learn something new every day. I haven’t followed the case too much and I just thought Zanny the Nanny was something the media made up to refer to the fact that Casey was drugging her kids (i.e., Xanax) instead of hiring sitters.
Wow, even this one demonstrates her complete lack of knowledge with regards to 1) what happens to a body under the water in various circumstances, and what various circumstance do to a body under water, and 2) just how hard it is to find something the size of a small child in undergrowth.
I have/can draw from experience in both, and she’s totally misinformed in both cases.
It also sounds like she got a lot of her circus animal information from the book ‘Water for Elephants’ or something.
Well, that’s the great thing about Susanann–other posters, maybe they’re crazy about this or that subject, but then in other threads they’re perfectly normal. With her, granted, she doesn’t constantly increase in craziness, but neither does her craziness decrease either. She is equally misinformed on every topic, from gun control to the national debt to the Casey Anthony case, and she’s just as crazy today as she was in 2002 and will be exactly as crazy in 2020.
My personal favorites are her assertions that Republicans have been great for black people because Republicans want everyone to have guns and supported the development of GPS.
I guess the real “Southern Strategy” was to make sure all black Americans could, um, head south.
There was a thread recently in GQ where she said Isaac Asimov had stolen the “every mammal lives to a billion heartbeats” theory from her, back in the '60s or '70s.
I’ve had her on ignore since she appeared, but I’ll almost always take a peek at her posts anyway. They’re so damn good, they just HAVE to be fattening.
Honestly, arguing/debating with her is like activating a conspiracy theorist madlibs program. You never know what she’s going to say, but you can bet that it’ll contradict something she said previously, that she claims she never said (even when you provide her with links to her previous posts).
I was totally unsurprised when she started on the gold thing. She strikes me as someone who’s elderly, not too bright, operating on outdated information, and planning on any number of Ron Paul-esque future scenarios.
If I’m not mistaken, I believe she once insisted that the reason the Nazis never invaded Switzerland was because Switzerland had a policy of no surrender, which supposedly made the prospect of fighting them in a war an ordeal too terrible to contemplate. Not the mountains or the overwhelming lack of strategic purpose for such an invasion. Nope, it was Swiss super-soldiers (and their very fancy bayonets).
That post actually changed my opinion of her; the claim is so bizarre and personal that I have to wonder if she has an actual mental disorder rather than being ‘crazy’ in the everyday sense of the word.
