http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=263819&page=2&pp=50
Wherein Your Humble Servent is rebuked:
Seems to me, though I might be mistaken, that the much esteemed Minty and Sevastapol were having a bit o’ fun. In their badinage, I detected no real animosity or rancor, just a couple good ol’ boys taking a jocular pose of mutual pomposity. (Pomposity? Come now, Minty is a Texas boy, the very idea is absurd!)
I would have thought that the line “the popcorn is a coincidence” would have tipped you off that I was having a bit of a jape. In a way, a form of applause, encouraging the sort of good-humored riposte demonstrated by the aforementioned esteemed.
Propriety is all very well, but isn’t this sort of good-natured fun vastly superior, both in intent and content, to barely veiled contempt that skirts the rules, but violates the spirit? Are not the rules intended to promote civility and prudent discourse? Did you detect rancor and contempt that eluded me?
Now, if I was unclear, if, indeed, you sincerely believed that I was hoping to provoke bitterness and insult, I apologize. If you could misunderstand, so could another. I often depend on the reader’s capacity to detect wry irony without being smacked in the face with a smilie, so that the humor impaired might be advised of my intent.
Is that it? Had I included a smilie with my “popcorn” comment, would that have passed muster? Personally, I loathe smilies, can’t remember the last time I used one, if ever. But if such is needed to remain within the pale of your good graces, I suppose…
I took Minty and Sevastapol to be indulging in a bit of spoofery, as was my encouraging remark. I found thier conversation very informative. light-hearted, and respectful in the fashion that genial affection permits familiarity and eschews pomposity. Given that so many of our correspondents can skirt the rules of propriety while indulging themselves in barely masked contempt and calumny, I would have thought such refreshing.
I do not suggest that rules are made to be broken, but rules that cannot be tickled are petrified pomposities. Chains are not broken by such as these, nor ignorance dispelled, they are lifeless and deadening.
In no wise do I imply any disrespect for the difficulty of your task or the sincere effort clearly expended in pursuit of a worthy goal. I remain, as always,
Your humble servant,
e.