Threads I refuse to dignify with a response.

“Help gun nuts describe their views”

How is pitting it not responding to it?

This is the pit, don’t get logical.

Forget it, he’s rolling.

Seems to have been a lot of them recently.

I didn’t respond to the global warming thread. Wait a minute, yes I did.

How about an undignified response?

I’d add this thread to the list but it’s already too late.

Way to dignify, pal.

“Thugs firing randomly into crowds. Was this ever done in the past or is it mainly a modern practice?” - A Modern Practice? Whut the hail? As in “We live in modern times now, so let’s start shooting randomly into crowds. It’s time we disperse with this antiquated notion that crowds shouldn’t be shot into.”

“Are you a coffee pooper?” - The last thing I want to know is the color and viscosity of someone’s poop. It does not benefit me in any way to know this information.

“I’m naturally argumentative, why?” - Thanks for the warning. I’m not responding.

“Where Do I Find the MIL_STD Specification for Chocolate Cookies?” - I would love to respond with “Your mother-in-law wants to know how much venereal disease chocolate cookies spread?” but I’m sure at least 15 other people have already done so.

“Are you OK with a real life “Eye of Sauron” for mass surveillance?” - You mean a tower instead of satellites and aircraft? Is one being built? Somehow this got 6 pages.

C’mon, gun-nuts need all the help they can get … now let’s everyone be charitable and help these poor unfortunates describe their views. There’s no harm being helpful to those being burnt to a crisp.

Any thread that demands that I (or anyone else) completely justify their opinions on a matter to the satisfaction of some jackass marginally intelligent enough to type on the internet.

How about NO?

How would *your *response add dignity? :smiley:

Go back to your fantasies about shooting cops who try to enforce democratically-passed laws you simply happen not to personally like.

Who the fuck was this a response to?

The OP. Who did you think?

More accurately, he’s responding to his strawman of me, the most vividly hallucinated figure since Harvey. But hey, what do I know? I only wrote my posts; ElvisL1ves is the expert on what my words really mean!

Yours is not a winning hand. I’d recommend giving it up.

You spelled that wrong.

Isn’t your real problem that I *do *know what you mean, better than you do in fact? If you could show me where I’m wrong, no doubt you would do so instead of flouncing like just another Internet braggart/coward who gets shown up.

Oh YEAH! That is exactly the problem. And it could be solved so easily, by just letting you think for us. Why are people so stubborn? So unwilling to let their superiors think for them?

I mean, you fucking well KNOW better than he does, what he means, so why all the conflict? It’s a damn shame is what it is.