No, it was a scenario where I was trying to be as big of a sarcastic wanker as you. If you consider using your own tone/techniques “baiting” then maybe you should re-read and re-evaluate your posts.
“No, it was a scenario where I was trying to be as big of a sarcastic wanker as you.”
Good effort!
My own “agenda”? That’s a pretty big accusation there, and I expect you to show exactly what my “agenda” is. Do you have any “proof” of this “agenda”, or are you building towards a hyperbolic accusation here without any evidence?
No, they didn’t, and the Silence on that case is equally as disappointing and disheartening to me. Silence on atrocities certainly doesn’t indicate disapproval. Your point?
You and your Hate have finally crossed the line here. You’ve accused me of something, with no evidence or cause, that is absolutely contrary to my belief system. You are not going to get away with baseless accusations or sneaky little implications of anti-Muslim sentiments by me, on this message board or elsewhere.
<< sigh >> That’ll teach me to apologize to a putz.
<< *reinstates Putz * >>
Putz.
Sam Stone, many thanks for your valuable input, too
guess you get to be right sometimes
heh
My apologies for using the word “agenda”. it was incorrect and completely out of order for me to accuse you.
My point is that I do not see an outright condemnation as tacit approval. perhaps I see differently to you.
You have your view of the world, I have mine. Please do not see my disagreement of yours as an accusation.
As for my “hate” d you want to tell me what that is?
Curses! He has sniffed out our dastardly plot to make him say the “F” word and so get himself banned! He is a clever opponent indeed…But, is he clever enough for–The Cookie Gambit?
"C’mon, Rider, say it–what do the first letters of “For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge” spell out? I’ll give you a cookieeeee if you say it. C’mon, we won’t tell Mom, promise…"
DDG, your powers of insult precede you.
DDG, thanks you for all the personal insults that seem to be your idea of an online personality, and as it is already 2003 here, I wish you a happy new year.
They–“precede”–me? WTF? They “come before me”?
Is English a second language for you?
Oh, well. << shrug >> Happy New Year to you, too, putz.
Precede…yes…check your dictionary. Maybe it’s different in US English, but that’s correct in English English.
“Lack of outright condemnation”. My apologies.
DDG, I just checked with the Microsoft Word USA dictionary. Precede is good to go. I’ll refrain from the gloating and insults that I would expect from you.
And assuming on the very unlikely offchance that you were challenging my usage…to say that someone’s reputation precedes them, is very standard.
Yeah, saying someone’s reputation precedes them is standard, but their “powers of insult” precede them? Like, first you hear about their powers of insult, then you meet them?
Help out a poor confused girl here, please.
“Like, first you hear about their powers of insult, then you meet them?”
Like, uh, yeah. What I meant was, that I was hardly surprised by his abusive post.
Anthracite,
Why don’t you explain what you meant by the above? A terrorist attack on 3 innocents and all you can think of in response is that the entire Muslim world (“all” bolded) should come out and condemn it or else, just like in the past, you will construe it as “not explicit disapproval”.
That’s how it reads, and to me, that means you will personally need to hear all major Muslim leaders (hope you have an idea of who they are) condemn it on CNN or else you will think the Muslim world condones these attacks just like it has been doing in the past (which ones?).
That sounds pretty loaded to me. But, I hope you can clarify what you meant.
Litost, apparently you are carrying the same “hate” as me.
Well, then maybe you should have said that.
I did say that, but obviously not in sufficiently basic, monosyllabic terms for you to comprehend without elementary clarification.
By on the subject:
So, reading abcnews.com, they are still looking for links to see if the shootings are linked to Al Qaeda.
Will it make any difference if they are? If so, what? How will this change things?