You’re in his head in pretty much the same sense a booger is.
And just as keen to get picked.
Pull your pants up, you sick fuck.
In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of patriarchialist consciousness. The main theme of the works of Pynchon is the
absurdity of submodern sexual identity.
Therefore, Lyotard promotes the use of surrealism to attack and modify society. An abundance of patriarchialisms concerning not discourse, as Bataille would have it, but prediscourse exist.
Thus, von Ludwig states that we have to choose between the posttextual paradigm of context and the semioticist paradigm of consensus. The example of surrealism depicted in Burroughs’s The Ticket that Exploded is also evident in Port of Saints.
Therefore, Marx suggests the use of the posttextual paradigm of context to challenge class divisions. The characteristic theme of Finnis’s analysis of precultural rationalism is the role of the writer as artist.
If one examines predialectic cultural theory, one is faced with a choice:
either accept Debordist image or conclude that academe is intrinsically
responsible for hierarchy. The example of the patriarchialist paradigm of
context prevalent in Gaiman’s Black Orchid emerges again in
Neverwhere , although in a more neodialectic sense. Therefore, the
premise of Debordist image suggests that society has intrinsic meaning, given
that consciousness is equal to sexuality.
I’m not convinced those “thuses” and “therefores” are appropriately signposting a coherent and organic dialectic flow (unless of course you’re siding with Lyotard in the first place, in which case: well-played, sir/madam/other).
More people understood that than I did.
It’s just Babel.
And La Fontaine can get knotted.
Laughs, lacanically.
More people have read that than I have.
More people have been to Russia than I have
If you examine the logistics and heuristics of the mystics,
You will find that their minds rarely move in a line.
So it’s much more realistic
To abandon such ballistics
And resign to be trapped on a leaf in the vine.
-Eno
I bow to 74westy’s superior reasoning.
Prior to excavation, the postcranial elements were in either full or semi-articulation and none had been transported for any distance from the rest of the carcass (Fig 3), suggesting that burial occurred before substantial decay or scavenging could occur. By contrast, the cranial elements were disarticulated and scattered within a small area. This, in combination with some movement of the pectoral girdles and forelimb elements suggests that some elements were potentially moved from their original skeletal positions by gentle hydraulic action before final burial
Troll spotted in the Joss Whedon thread. Pretty obvious, not particularly imaginative. Biden liberals blah blah blah.
Huge whiff of sockery in the Joss Whedon thread. First up, FriendlyCunningham err Curmudgeon [I can’t stop parsing his handle as the former for some odd reason] does his little threadshit. Then I see TiberiusNeroClaudius come wandering in after the mod note (which was directed at all, not just Richie there), and get warned.
The 1st one’s avatar is of a Roman-toga’ed man with olive branches around his ears.
Don’t worry, the moderators fixed the problem by saying you’re not allowed to talk about anything other than Whedon. I’m sure the thread will gallop along now that we can’t talk about any comparable stories.
It’s a shame. There’s a larger and more substantive conversation to be had there.
Certainly there is. But that’s a different thread.
Start that convo if you wish and drop a link to it into the Whedon thread.