Trump and Harris agree to September 10th ABC debate - Watch Along Starts at Post 431

Harris should have done it to him.

Demigagory?

Emphasis on the gag. :face_vomiting:

Excuses or not, perhaps at least some of them will decide not to bother going out to vote for him. Every little bit helps!

Most Americans did not watch this debate. But Harris did far better. She kept her composure even as Trump started talking about Pelosi or immigrants and animals. She did not answer every question, but she repeatedly got her main points across and differentiated herself from both Biden and Trump. She threaded some difficult needles and avoided mendacity.

I wasn’t going to watch the debate, but like a train wreck, did so anyway. But I refused to hear the analysis and am pleased Swift endorsed the sane candidate. Trump got angry, got rattled, said a few weird things. But I found him more coherent than expected. I think the moderators did a good job of letting both people respond briefly and gently cutting people off.

Will there be another debate? I ho knows?

Someone from my small Minnesota home town just posted that Trump had to debate 3 people, and got a few agreements.

I’d reply that being corrected for lying isn’t really having to debate the moderators, but it would be a water against a dam.

Great! Now we can find out:
Can men vote? Because if not, I’ve got a problem with that.

(Okay, I’ll stop. But seriously…really??)
Good night.

That is the part that is incomprehensible.

Nah, it doesn’t work on anybody.

I think maybe she was overprepared. Better that than go off on unhinged rants, though.

Second best news all night! (after Taylor Swift!)

Hillary Clinton must be worn out from laughing.

I watched the whole thing, then checked Fox News, then came here. You called it 100%. They only fact check poor ole Donnie.

I was thinking about just watching live comments due to my fellow hatred of the orangefuck. But tune in. Watch the replay. He looks like the dumbass he was in 1992. It’s actually refreshing to see this windmill-hating fraudster flail and flail and flail in the breeze.

I thought of that, too. Heard that Hillary Clinton frequently offered assistance to Harris for debate prep. Looks like it paid off.

Well, when Harris spoke truthful facts, there was no need to fact-check her. But Trump with his “immigrants eating pets,” among his other bizarre claims, then yes, he’s going to be fact-checked more than her.

With the debate implosion then Tay-Tay chiming in, I can’t think of a time when Donnyboy lost more than in 2020.

(Stole this :grimacing:)

Will nobody think of my pet mallard?

LOL, I just scared my dog.

That really was the most unhinged part of the whole event!

Rightwing WABC radio is trying desperately to make it sound good for Trump and they’re flailing. They interviewed Anthony Weiner (hey… you get what you can get) and he is pointing out that Trump got roasted.

If anyone wants further confirmation of who won the debate, look no further than Fox News. In one column they’re quoting a right-wing radio talk-show host claiming that the moderators were always fact-checking Trump – very unfair! In another, House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y. is quoted as calling the debate moderators “pro-Kamala activists”.

Yes, Fox News, we know who wiped the floor with the Orange Blowhard in tonight’s debate, but thanks for confirming it! :smiley: