Trump: It's Yuuuuuggggeeee!

Hahahaha. Do you imagine “Little Marco” must be a reference to Rubio’s junk? Couldn’t the reference imply that Trump considers Rubio to be a small person politically?

Trump did not call “Carly” Fiorina ugly. But what do the facts matter when you are talking politics?

You expect people not to defend themselves when attacked. I laughed at that.

This lady walked into a bar, and she asked the bartender for a double entendre.

So he gave her one.

[ba-dum-BUM]

What did Trump mean when he said this, “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president?!”

He meant she was too pretty for the job?

She’s way prettier than Trump, anyway. So is a baboon’s ass. These are not the kinds of stones he should think of throwing. Donald, don’t you realize you’re the greatest gift to editorial cartoonists since Nixon?

Would you defend Hillary and Bernie for acting like that?

Or maybe you’d be more comfortable acknowledging that hurling schoolyard taunts on a public stage, and responding in kind to them, is hardly the stuff of which presidents are made, whatever their party.

You expect an adult who’s being attacked by children to smile, shake his/her head ruefully at their antics, and go on to demonstrate a responsible command of facts and policies and experience etc. by comparison.

Self defense is a human right. Why do you hate human rights?

Not everything you have a “right” to do is a thing it is a good idea to do in any and all circumstances.

Sticks and stone may break my bones but words will never hurt me.

Not a self defense situation.

So I am the only one who reads that as “U.G.”? Really?

That’s nonsense.

No Rubio started this when he said Donald had “small hands”!

Which participant is under the age of 21? Or under 18? Or under 13?

Trump is a counter-puncher. You seem to object to Trump defending himself. If you don’t want Hiroshima, don’t start Pearl Harbor.

Just the other day, CNN spokesmodel and wanna-be political king-maker, Jake Tapper, via an internet hookup, told Trump about some group claiming that David Duke supports Trump. Trump replied, "I have to look at the group. I mean, I don’t know what group you’re talking about. You wouldn’t want me to condemn a group that I know nothing about. I have to look. If you would send me a list of the groups, I will do research on them. And certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong.

“You may have groups in there that are totally fine and it would be very unfair. So give me a list of the groups, and I’ll let you know,”

It sounds to me as if Trump didn’t understand which group(s) Tapper had originally mentioned or why they were saying Duke endorsed Trump. A real reporter would have investigated the situation before pressing ahead with his political diatribe. Trump asked for a list of the groups Tapper was referring to. Clearly, there was a miscommunication over this internet connection that the CNN viewing audience wasn’t subjected to. Did Tapper ever supply Trump with the name of the group who claimed Duke endorsed Trump? Or doesn’t it matter?

Trump had previously denounced the KKK and he denounced the KKK after the Trapper debacle. When it became clear what Tapper was asking. All of what Tapper had been asking.

But Tapper and CNN had the sound bite they needed. Move along, move along. No clarification needed.

In this current politically correct society? Seriously? :smack:

Yeah, we all know that Donald Trump is much too restrained and responsible to shoot from the lip and attack groups of people without doing his research first… :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

If that’s how you defend your position, you’ve got a lot to learn about self-defense.:smiley:

Never bring a strawman to a debate, Dorothy. It has no brain.

That is an old saying taught to children to help them learn how adults are expected to act.
You’ll have to explain how that constitutes political correctness.

Or are you just following the current fad of dismissing anything you disagree with as political correctness and therefore deserving of ridicule?

We already know he’s a big dick.

If you’re curious, this was the part where I tuned out.