Oh good, something new. I was getting tired of that Jerry Rice stickum thing, honestly. 
This is one of those sports things that seemed like a super big deal at the time, but after a while I realized that it didn’t really change much of anything. Think Jean Van De Velde’s triple bogey heard 'round the world, or the Orlando Magic grabbing the #1 draft pick after barely missing the playoffs, and then picking up Horace Grant, or Konishiki being denied Yokozuna promotion and leading to shrieking alarmist panics that the Sumo Association would never give the rank to a foreigner. Paul Lawrie pulls off the historic win, makes this or that Ryder Cup team, and then is never heard from again. The Magic win one freaking conference championship, promptly get stomped into paste by the Rockets, lose Shaq to the Lakers, and never accomplish a damn thing again. Akebono and Musashimaru get tsunatori, eventually followed by four Mongolians, oh, and now the Japanese born rikishi can’t even sniff the rank (the last one to make it was Wakanohana, just to put it in perspective).
Well, first, let me get to the fight itself. Douglas owned it. Period. He was quick and alert and mobile and he almost never allowed Tyson to get the kind of offense he wanted. Especially in the early rounds, he got a lot of unanswered shots. If a fighter has a considerable height or reach disadvantage (and especially if it’s both), he’s going to want to keep it as tight as possible, and Douglas took advantage by really smothering him every time Tyson closed in. Meanwhile, Tyson’s failings were well-documented by the announcers. Didn’t move his head. Didn’t go to the body. Didn’t work combinations. Didn’t move around. Didn’t work.
Given this (and even setting aside all the unbelievable sickening crap he’d be wallowing in on a regular basis later in life), I can’t honestly see why there are still so many diehards who insist that he got robbed. I know it’s become pretty much standard practice to focus on one tiny, tiny crumb and go on and on and on and on and on about it, utterly ignoring the remaining 99.99% of what happened and not even being aware that there is a big picture, but why should Tyson get this privilege? Look, even if there was a long count (which there wasn’t), all this means is that Tyson got his butt handed to him for eight rounds and then pulled one out of his hindquarters on an incredibly lucky shot. Ask any wrestling fan familiar with the difference between “job” and “put over” how mighty and invincible this totally does not make him look.
Which brings me back to my original point…what did this change, really? Douglas was a one-hit wonder; literally the moment Evander Holyfield carved him a new one, that was it. He’s a lot closer to Clubber Lang than Rocky Balboa, in that he took down the champ under ideal circumstances, had reality catch up to him in his very first title defense, and then vanished off the face of the earth. And even if Douglas hadn’t shattered the aura of invincibility and started Tyson’s downward spiral, Holyfield would have. I mean, let’s be honest, once Holyfield entered the picture, it was pretty much him and everyone else. Let’s not forget, too, that Tyson’s rape conviction was a 20-ton roadblock in his career regardless of how many or few minor stumbling blocks he ran over beforehand.
It’s strange, though. All throughout the 80’s I kept hearing about how Tyson was this beast with an aura of invincibility and everyone was afraid of him etc., and I literally have not seen a single fight of his that demonstrates this. I think it speaks volumes that most kids of the era (myself included) know him mainly as a video game character. Why was he so feared? Who did he beat that mattered a damn? I couldn’t say.