Una: Go Drink a Juicebox

You’re quite welcome.

I was stunned to find out Martini Enfield could count to three.

Zing! HI-yo! It’s the Pit, dah-lings! Tip your waiter!

No. I gave her an incredibly gentle ribbing for not understanding a mocking pile-on that is an internet-wide meme in no way exclusive to Facebook or even social networking sites. I’m pitting her for taking it so personally that she decided to follow me around in another forum in a sad attempt to try to get in some hits of her own, outside the Pit.

Every other post I multiquoted in that thread was at least as old as Una’s. What’s your point? I should wear sackcloth and ashes for not checking the timestamp on every post I respond to in a live thread?

I think you pretty much nailed everything 100% on the head, at least from my point of view.

Really? You’re seriously going to condone extra-Pit, off-topic harassment of a specific poster? Really? You think this is acceptable behavior that is allowed under the rules of this board? If so, have the balls to put it in writing, so that if I ever get the urge to be an insane bitch who doesn’t understand boundaries I can wave your post around and say, “But **Miller **said I could!”

But I see, it’s not *threadshitting *if you come into a thread to mock the OP *poster *instead of the OP topic. How *blind *I’ve been! *If only *there were some guideline for what threadshitting means on the Dope… Oh wait.

Beginner’s Guide to Glossary of Terms on Straight Dope Message Boards (emphasis added):

Unless Una’s statements about me were literal and not sarcastic (uh huh), I’d say it’s *pretty fucking clear *she’s belittling me. But of course, she didn’t even get so much as a specific mod note for it–just a general hand-wave to take personal attacks back to the Pit. :rolleyes:

I haven’t seen this much butthurt since I visited the Podunksville Spanking Museum and Sody Fountain.

Heres what I think you should do.

I think you should write a really long post about all this stuff, quoting loads of people, and rules, and precedent, with a few metaphors and perhaps some illustrations. Then you should add in some rolls-eyes smilies, because you like them. Add some inane snark for your bestest WOW mates in the whole wide world to wet themselves over, then wobble off to ATMB where you and Irishman can multi-quote each other back and forth until you simultaneously cream your pants.

Yeah. You should do that.

I don’t really have a dog in this fight but it seems to me that people trying to one up each other with ever more preposterous and hyperbolic insults is something that predates the internet, probably by millenia. See “yo mama” jokes, for instance.

Your choice of fashion statement is of no concern to me. The point is that the question had been asked and answered, the thread had moved on, and to go back and reply to it three days later with a content-free snipe just for the opportunity to dish out more of your trademark snark looks kinda desperate.

Don’t forget a lot of "Really?"s and "Seriously?"s. That’ll really show 'em.

Yawn.

I didn’t say that. Didn’t say anything like that. You’re excluding a number of middle options between, “It’s not thread shitting,” and “It’s perfectly acceptable.”

I think the key element you’re overlooking there is “shitting on a discussion.” I don’t really see how Una’s post could be read as “shitting on the discussion” you were having.

Which, again, isn’t the same thing as saying that what she posted was hunky-dory. Just that it wasn’t thread shitting, or trolling.

Hi, Jack.

Obviously you’ve never watched Ass Pounders 24 in an IMAX theater with “Judas cradle” seating.

Or Avatar in 2-D.

I think the key element you’re overlooking there is the “or.” You know. The bit I *underlined *for you: “shitting on a discussion, by belittling the topic or the people discussing it.”

Were you able to read it that time?

Good luck with that.

Well… you got me there.

hangs head

Uh yeah, about that, there’s a 0.00000001% chance I would ever google you, and if I did, there’s a 0.0000001% chance I’d think you were one of those dreaded Christians because some insecure hump called you a “Sister in Christ.”

I’d think your numerous “Look at me, I’m an atheist” statements would be more likely to pop up.

That means the people discussing as a group, as in “Harry Potter readers are lame”. Now you know. Your interpretation would make that “or” a re-iteration of the no insulting people outside of the Pit rule.

I don’t have a dog* in this dick* measuring contest. I kind of “know” both Una and SFG from having read a few of their posts and ISTM this whole thing has been poorly handled by both; SFG initial snark was sophomoric and **Una’**s butthurt reaction to it way over-the-top. Thus the current knife fight in Panama we’re witnessing.

Having said that, Christ-On-A-Cracker, what the living fuck are you on about Miller? Obviously you’re siding with Una on this pitting which is fine by me, as I said I don’t give a crap about the whole shebang but I’ve always thought of you as a pretty level headed guy when it comes to arguments – at least in the ones I’ve either participated with you in thread or others I’ve read you’ve posted to. So I am befuddled by your “definition” of thread-shitting as it appears to have been pulled directly from your ass. Might as well wipe it clean and try a new line of attack that doesn’t involve pretzel-logic. Surely you can do better than that…

Just a thought.

*bitch & snatch for the sake of gender correctness?

I think his definition is perfectly fine, and rather than being pulled from his ass, is pulled from CK Dexter’s glossary Miller linked to.

eta: He even went out of his way to point out that he wasn’t excusing Una’s post as AOK.

I’m pretty sure Miller is never actually wrong. If he is, reality reasserts itself to match his statements.

WHOOOOOOOOOOOSH.

See, this is funny because *Una’s *original question was 'cause she thought people might be trying to change Cooks Source’s Google returns. By posting crazy shit on their FB wall. Which is retarded.

What is says is “belittling […] the people discussing [the topic].” If you think this doesn’t apply, please explain how (a) Una’s posts are belittling me and/or (b) she’s not doing it because of the topic I’m discussing. Call me crazy, but “you’re a worthless poster who contributes nothing and therefore this thread is stupid and your opinions don’t matter” sounds to me to be a lot like “belittling […] the people discussing [the topic].”