Updike and New Iskander, it's a twofer tuesday!

Still smarting, aren’t we?

- THE FinnAgain, THE scrotal scab…

(Oh yes, you would me so with your wit and humor)

No matter how many alliterations you make about me, the fact remains that you’ll still be saying things like Valerie Plame may’ve tortured people.

Why don’t you work on your stupidity and ignorance first, and your alliterations second? Why don’t you read a goddamn thing about the Plame case before holding forth with your absurd pronouncements? Why don’t you read up on intelligence oversight policies? Etc…

So yeah, in a nutshell, why don’t you do something about your agressively ignorantly painfully stupid posting, and then work on sing song insults later?

[Bugs Bunny]
Mmmm… couuuuuld be.
[/bb]

I’m still having trouble believing that anybody, let alone anybody who’d choose to pay money to belong to a board about fighting ignorance, could be that dumb. It seems possible that it’s an act, but I admit that after a while it’s beginning to look less and less likely. After all… “Never ascribe to malice what can be explained by stupidity.”

D’oh!
Now I’m sounding like you Isky. The shame, the shame!

That should have read “You would hurt me so…”

Because, ya know, your devestating critiques of my personality, based on hard logic and supported with massive textual evidence, simply cut me to the quick. I bleed.

But I will toss you a bone, and rather than simply pointing out that you’re a pool of raw sewage in the otherwise (sorta) pristine waters of the Dope, I’ll actually fight some of your ignorance. Read this. Shut up. Thank me later.

huh. Go figure, I thought it was “you wound me so…”

Well, that was what I wrote at first. But I was editing my post in a word document at the same time and cuttin’ and pasting as I went and tried for a flashier sentence. Suffice it to say, preview is my friend, and simpler is better. Should’ve left well enough alone.

Le sigh.

Vous parlez?

<TITRE Cyrano de Bergerac>
<GENRE vers>
<AUTEUR Edmond Rostand>

THE Finn Again, THE slimy squid

[nitpick]

Squid isn’t slimy if it’s prepared properly. Perhaps you’re thinking of okra.

[/nitpick]

Why am I getting a mental image of Will Arnett doing a chicken dance?

Patience, my precious darlings! LE Squid will be “prepared properly” yet…

So no comment on oversight of intelligence agencies? Or the fact that you don’t do research before spouting off? Or your ridiculous absolutist categorical ‘thinking’? Or your partisan whinging? Or the fact that you very rarely have the courtesy to make sure that your posts are readable by your fellow posters?

Ya know, the issues? That you were Pitted for?

You are one truly disgusting pathetic lying weasel.

You didn’t start this as an attempt to explain issues. You started with insults. Now suddenly you want to talk issues?

If you truly want to discuss issues, apologize and open a new GD thread.

…THE FinnAgain, THE piece of shit

Awww shucks, you’re too sweet.

No, moron, I did both. I pointed out your utter ignorance on topics upon which you were holding forth, your shitting in other threads with your inane 'anti-cia/librul" babbling, and your total disregard for making your posts readable by other Dopers. I pointed all of these out, yes, via insults. I did so, and would do so again, because you don’t deserve any better. Get that Isky? Your conduct on this message board has earned you this reaction, and you do not deserve to be treated as if you had anything to offer the community.

Okay, I’m sorry you’re such a worthless shit who somehow found its way to this message board in an effort to spread ignorance.
Am I forgiven now?

And no, you fucking tool, I’m Pitting you for your conduct. I’m not about to open a GD thread because it would be much harder, in GD, to call you a corpse felching maggot brained piece of flame-bait.

Henceforth, New Iskander is now known as The melon farmer.

Not just any melon farmer: THE Melon Farmer.

Shortly after Abu Ghraib hit the news, the late, great Desmostylus started a thread about it.

Perhaps some of you remember the horror and revulsion many of us experienced when we first saw the photos from Abu Ghraib and discovered that these acts were being actually being perpetrated by American soldiers. But not all of us! Right on cue, Old Pustule dropped this steaming turd into the discussion:

After which, he went on for two or three pages trying to defend himself and justify his views. Which only made things worse. He was too stupid, for example, to understand that the administration argued we needed to invade Iraq to put an end to the torture there, not commit more of it.

So my vote goes for the Pustule. He’s about as stupid as they come.

Plus, his poetry is truly doggerel.

“What if it was Saddam under hood?”
“What if it was one of Saddam henchmen”
“who might be those people under hoods”
“Don’t Saddam henchmen deserve to be hooded”

Isky why do you hate [del]freedom[/del] articles, punctuation and syntax?

But I notice that’s the same intellectually barren ‘reasoning’ for Isky going after Plame. It seems like many of his arguments can be reduced to “What if [absurd thing I’m making up] is true? Wouldn’t that justify [other absurd thing]?”

Mr. Svin, it’s been a looong time!

Like the saying goes, stir the cesspool, what comes up to the surface?

I said it once before, but it bears repeating.

Svin, go kiss Saddam’s ass!

Your posts?

FinnAgain, I must apologize in advance. I might not have time for you now, that Mr. Svin emerged from cesspool depths.

Further, I’d like to apologize for carrying our little spat too far. I forgot that truly malignant asswipes like **Svin ** still infest the face of this planet. Comparing to Svin you really not a bad sort. Actually, I’m beginning to like you, all things considered in proper perspective.

So, I’m sorry. May I take away all the names I called you? I really can use them for a more appropriate target. Please?